This year, the international news looked like a television show, one day the drama turned back, it is not, the past only 72 hours, the situation in Pakistan suddenly as if the "fast forward" button was pressed, first France raised the Palestinian flag, and as a result, the sky was ordered to remove.
Then the Colombian president knocked on the table in the United Nations, shouting for group intervention; not waiting for the West to react, the Houthi armed forces used drones to bomb Israel's land, this series of actions as if someone had drawn up a script in advance, one ring a ring, all running for the four words of "escalation of the situation".
It is no coincidence that these three things are put together. They reflect that the atmosphere of the game between major powers has changed, and the attitude of small countries has become harder. Even countries that have always "watched the theatre" have begun to move their hands and feet. In the final analysis, the world's tolerance towards Israel, It may really reach a critical point.
A flag punctured the "face" of the West.
France has said that the previous period of high-profile supporting the Palestinians, seemed to be quite a position, and as a result, only after a day, the French Ministry of Internal Affairs issued an order, demanding to remove the Palestinian flag hanging at the door of the City Hall, is it not his own face?
What’s more fun is that the reasons they’ve given are “correct”—which government agencies must be neutral and can’t hang foreign flags at all—sounds reasonable, but the question arises: how can the Ukrainian flag be hanged before?
As a result, the French society directly blasted the pot, many municipal officials said, you yourself as the master to support Palestine, we just follow a little, and the result is now to be approved?
Many French netizens began to question whether the so-called "freedom, equality and fraternity" is also divided into people, occasions and camps.
In fact, this is unclear, that the West has always held up on the Palestinian issue, while safeguarding its own "moral height" on human rights, while not daring to blame the mountain behind Israel, this time the "draft operation" of France, but to expose this inner contradiction all.
A shout brought the silent country to the table
Colombian President Petro was a blockbuster at the United Nations General Assembly. He directly made it clear that he wanted to organize a cross-continental multinational force to stand up and protect the lives of the Palestinian people.
In the United Nations, most countries are accustomed to saying "peaceful coexistence" and "dialogue settlement" scenes, such as Petro's name, directly shouting to the army, is not often seen.
Although this proposal is still a lot of distance from the real landing, but his "breaking the ice" move, meaning is not small, has been the western countries dominate the world "who to intervene, not to intervene who" rhythm, now the southern countries have also begun to speak out, no longer to be an observer, but to be a part of the decision.
Of course, the reality is always more complicated than the ideal, if the United Nations really wants to let this multinational force move, it has to have a vote to veto this threshold, the United States just say a "no", this is basically a shell, but even can not really send troops.
This tone also shows that more and more countries are beginning to feel that time can no longer be delayed, and the situation can no longer be allowed to Israel to "play itself".
A round of air strikes caught Israel off guard
Then there are the air strikes of the Houthi armed forces. Although they have been in the flames of war all year round, this time they did a bit "high-profile": they directly sent drones to attack several targets in southern Israel.
According to the Israeli military itself, the attack indeed caused them little trouble, and the Iron Dome was very slowly broken through.
You should know that Israel's "Iron Dome" has been blown into the world's most advanced air defense system, and as a result, it has been broken by the Houthi "non-mainstream army", which not only does not hang on the face of Israel, but also those countries in the West that rely on "technical barriers" must start to be vigilant.
And this matter is not just as simple as an attack. The fact that the Houthi armed forces dare to attack Israel so blatantly shows that they are not without support. Although this type of non-state force does not have a formal military establishment, in modern warfare, it has become an existence that cannot be ignored.
The most important thing is that the timing of this attack was too "coincident": just the day after Colombia proposed to form a multinational coalition, this rhythm didn't seem accidental.
Israel’s “myth” is being dismantled a bit by reality
In the past few decades, Israel has expanded unbridled. On the one hand, their defense lines are under pressure in more and more directions. Not only in the direction of Gaza, but also in the south and north, there are frequent news of attacks. No matter how awesome the air defense system is, It can't stand so many flying, bombing, and earth-drilling people taking turns to fight.
Not to mention that now there are more and more types of drones, missiles, rockets, low-cost, fast, and tired.
On the other hand, the internal affairs are not peaceful. Dissatisfaction in Israel is fermenting. * and anti-war rallies on the streets are becoming more and more frequent. The common people are not fools. They fight every day, prices are soaring, young people are on the front line, and the pressure of life is increasing. Naturally, I want to ask: "Is this battle worth it?"
The United States, of course, is still supporting, but the support is increasingly working hard, the military aid of billions of dollars a year is not a small number, the domestic finances of the United States is not iron-hit, the midterm elections are near, Trump must also consider the issue of votes, continue to support Israel without the bottom line, will not trigger a domestic rebound?
The world is changing channels and the rules are being rewritten
What happened in the past three days, although it seems to be fragmentary news fragments, when you look at it together, you will find that the "channels" of the world are switching. In the past, the international order in which one country had the final say and other countries nodded in agreement is slowly losing its appeal.
The withdrawal of the French flag indicates that the old-fashioned Western powers faced the issue of Pakistan, the internal and external contradictions have been out of control; the shout of Colombia, representing the southern countries to begin to take the initiative "on the table to eat", no longer content with "sitting on the side to watch"; Houthi's air strikes, is the "real war" of this change, telling everyone: not relying on the United Nations, can also do.
The deeper question is: who can still represent “justice”? who can continue to be the “judge”?
For China, this change in the situation is not a bad thing. We have always advocated peace, negotiation, fairness and justice. This situation just shows that it is impossible to sustain solely by force suppression and manipulation of public opinion. Countries pay more and more attention to actual interests and moral positions, rather than who has a loud voice and more weapons.
The show is over and the audience has changed.
These major events occurred at the same time, rather than the long-accumulated emotions finally had a breakthrough, from Europe to Latin America, from Yemen to Israel, each move is reminding us: the previous set of "you hit me" game rules, almost no use.
Of course, the situation is far from being “win-win,” but it can be assured that this years-long conflict in Palestine is about to enter a new phase, no longer just Israel, no longer just the United States.
More and more countries, organizations, and even "irregular armies" are trying to join this dialogue, or in other words, join this "reconstruction" in reality.
It's hard to say, but one thing that can be sure is that this fall of 2025 may be considered a divide, not because which side wins, nor because which side loses, but because more and more people begin to refuse to keep silent.