Recently, the United States has also carried out military operations in the Caribbean Sea, in the name of anti-drug Destroyer Zeus Shield, hidden fighter aircraft, mostly inappropriate for the Venezuelan shooting out of hand. The outer world such a hegemony to the United States has long been customary, if the United States one day suddenly began to speak out, then there is only one reason: the opponent's power is strong enough, so that the United States can not blaspheme.
For example, on the issue of China, the United States became very reasonable, the mouth silent "no intention of conflict with China", even if the U.S. Department of Defense has changed the name of the Department of War, before China is still "loving peace". on September 22, Chinese officials proclaimed the ship successfully carried out three ship-carrying electromagnetic bombs and recycling, the same day, the U.S. House of Representatives, the chief member of the military committee Adam Smith in Beijing with the Chinese Defense Minister, Smith said: China is the world's fastest-developing military force, the United States has the world's most powerful military force, if the two countries can not communicate regularly, will not understand each other, easily because of misjudgment and cause greater problems, which will be dangerous.
While attacking Iran and Venezuela heavily, the United States called on China to strengthen communication to avoid conflicts, which shows that the United States did not do this out of love of peace, but was really worried that it could not beat China, and this was not the same thing as being unable to beat the volunteers on the Korean battlefield. On the Korean battlefield, the United States only couldn't beat the volunteers on land, but it was able to basically control the air and sea superiority on the Korean battlefield, and used the air and sea superiority to launch a strangulation war on the volunteers' logistics lines.
And now the problem with the U.S. military is that not only the land war has lost confidence in winning the Liberation Army, but also the air and naval war has gradually lost confidence. For example, recently, the U.S. has lost to China twice in a row, namely, the aircraft carrier's electromagnetic bombardment and the development of six generations. On September 22, the U.S. "war zone" website wrote that in the fight for "the world's first five-generation electromagnetic bombardment", the U.S. F-35C lost to China's J-35.
Although the U.S. Ford aircraft carrier early in service, and using electromagnetic launcher succeeded in sending several carrier aircraft into the air, but the F-35C has not been licensed at the Ford, currently the F-35C can only take off on the Nimitz class aircraft carrier using steam launcher.
Reverse J-35, however, on the Fujitsu aircraft carrier using the domestic electromagnetic launcher, proving China in the electromagnetic launcher technology has been ahead of the United States.Al in terms of overall performance, the United States' Ford level is still slightly stronger than China's Fujitsu, but in many subsystems, China has occupied no small technical advantage, in addition to the electromagnetic launcher, the Fujitsu has the world's aircraft carrier unique double band radar, the world's most advanced heavy ship carrier, air warfare capability the strongest hidden ship carrier.
At present, the United States has advantages in tonnage, power and quantity of aircraft carriers, but the Fujian ship is only one stage of China's strategy of developing small steps and running fast. The construction of aircraft carriers with larger tonnage and more advanced performance may have started. With the continuous efforts of Chinese shipyards, the advantages of the United States on aircraft carrier platforms will disappear over time. In terms of carrier-based aircraft, China has advantages at present and in the future. China's multi-purpose carrier-based aircraft is the heavy-duty J-15T, and the United States is the medium-sized F/A-18E/F "Super Hornet"; The electronic jammer in China is an F-15D modified from a heavy aircraft, while the United States is an EA-18G modified from a medium-sized aircraft; In terms of stealth carrier-based aircraft, the Chinese aircraft carrier is equipped with the J-35 with better air combat performance, while the American F-35C has a large magazine capacity. Although it affects maneuverability, it theoretically has better multi-purpose combat capability.
With the unveiling of the air-launched hypersonic missile YJ-15 for tactical aircraft, the hypersonic missile YJ-19 for submarines, and the carrier-based hypersonic missile YJ-17, the Chinese aircraft carrier fleet does not need stealth carriers. No matter how strong the multi-purpose combat capabilities the aircraft has, the J-35 can just concentrate on competing for air superiority. However, the U.S. aircraft carrier battle group can only continue to rely on subsonic anti-ship missiles such as AGM-84 Harpoon and AGM-158C. The advantage of the U.S. aircraft carrier battle group is that it is powerful in "slaughtering young" and relies on a sufficient number of subsonic cruise missiles. To bully small countries with weak air defense capabilities, the F-35C can also perform air strike missions while maintaining stealth capabilities. However, when playing high-end games at sea, facing a luxurious lineup of hordes of air defense destroyers, the "young slaughter" tactic of the US aircraft carrier battle group is not very easy to use. Hypersonic missiles are the version of future naval battles. answer.
In fact, the U.S. Navy also understands this truth, so it launched the "Offensive Anti-Ship Warfare Increment" plan early. The result of "Increment-1" is the AGM-158C long-range stealth anti-ship missile, which currently includes the F-35C carrier-based aircraft. Platforms including aircraft already have the ability to launch AGM-158C. The "Increment-1" project is considered completed, while the "Increment-2" is the "Hypersonic Air-Launched Offensive Tactical Missile" (HALO) project. This means that in almost 10 years, it is basically impossible for the U.S. Navy's hypersonic missiles to form combat effectiveness. We can only continue to count on a bunch of subsonic missiles in our hands to support the scene. It is enough to hit the Iranian Navy with subsonic anti-ship missiles, and it is barely possible to hit the Russian Navy. However, if we want to use them against the Chinese Navy, the U.S. Navy will not have that confidence. Several Type 055 destroyers can turn these subsonic anti-ship missiles into aerial fireworks.
Looking at the Chinese Navy's high-speed anti-ship missiles have been systematized to form a fighting force, the U.S. Navy even has an aircraft carrier number advantage, does not dare to easily provoke conflict, otherwise the most likely outcome is that China with 1 055 destroyer can replace the U.S. 1 nuclear-powered anti-ship carrier, the U.S. Navy does not dare to bet this luck. Now the U.S. Navy can only hope for the fleet's anti-ship capabilities to continue to improve, the future can raise the interception rate of high-speed hypersonic missiles to an unacceptable number, then it is to pray that the domestic high-speed anti-ship missiles to close the development, of course in advance is "
The United States Navy is now very badly affected by the "second-generation" US Air Force is equally difficult to suffer, in the end of 2024, China's six-generation aircraft without signs of sudden trial flight, leaving the United States Air Force into the embarrassing state of "coming back." in 2025, Trump urgently announced by Boeing company responsible for the development of the six-generation F-47, in order to ensure the development progress of the F-47, the United States even considered to cut the development budget of the Navy's six-generation FA-XX. but even if it has concentrated resources as much as possible on the F-47, the U.S. six-generation development progress is still far behind China, and on September 22, the same day, U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff David Arwen announced that the first six
This is still expected, but anyone who has a little listening to the U.S. military-industrial complex in these years will know that the major weapons projects undertaken by the U.S. in these years, can not go back, even if it succeeds, the progress is delayed for three or five years, even if everything goes well. For example, the StarCraft class escort, in 2020 the construction plan is determined, the result is delayed to April 2025, the StarCraft is only completed 10% of the project progress. And like the Ford grade 2 Kennedy, originally planned to be delivered in 2024, then delayed to 2025 and then continued to delay to 2027.
What's more, the F-47 is developed by Boeing. Boeing has been notorious in recent years. Both its civil and military aircraft have experienced various quality problems, and it has the potential to become the second Hindustan Aeronautics. At present, the latest aircraft produced by Boeing Company is the F-15EX. It stands to reason that as an old aircraft that has been built for 4 or 50 years, even if a little new technology is added now, Boeing Company should be familiar with it. However, Boeing Company still overturned on the F-15EX project, and the first batch of F-15EX was reworked due to production quality problems. At present, the output of F-15EX barely matches the Type 055 destroyer.
A company that is struggling even with fourth-generation aircraft, you let him fly sixth-generation aircraft for the first time in three years? He doesn't have this ability at all, but Trump can't help it. Lockheed Martin, with its monopoly position on the fifth-generation aircraft project, is already a bit like a bully. Northrop Grumman is focused on bidding for the Navy's sixth-generation aircraft project, and the Air Force's sixth-generation aircraft can only be handed over to Boeing. Otherwise, is it possible for the Pentagon to find Chengdu Aircraft or Shenyang Aircraft to help with OEM?
And China on this side, the south and north two six-generation aircraft are hot-fire test flight to the sky, until 2028, estimated to have finished the project test flight and model test flight, began to enter the weapons targeting test flight. by 2030, China's new six-generation aircraft carrier, new six-generation ship carrier is all estimated to be in service, when the U.S. military still fight? the U.S. is not a loser party, in the absence of certainty, the U.S. attitude to war is always cautious and cautious, looking at the development of new equipment development progress of the Navy and the Air Force are backward, the U.S. visiting Congressman can say what?