When it comes to the "top stream" in the international political arena, Trump recognizes the second, but I'm afraid no one dares to recognize the first.
At the just-held United Nations General Assembly, he just turned into a personal show. He spoke for nearly an hour in the prescribed 15 minutes, setting a historical record.
Representatives from various countries in the audience looked at each other, because what Trump told was really in a trance: Is he here to discuss world problems, or is he another MAGA campaign rally?
As soon as Trump took office, he first came to the United Nations.
When he entered, he and his wife Melania suddenly stopped the automatic ladder and could only go up on their own.
During the speech, the vocabulary blackened the screen. To change with other leaders may be embarrassingly cold, but who is Trump?
He joked at the scene: The United Nations gave me a bad ladder and a bad vocabulary.
Then the talk turns, and the technical failure rises to the level of "United Nations inefficiency, no action."This trick "touch ceramics" play, instantly turned the scene into his home field.
Think of, when the Democratic candidate Harris encountered a malfunction of the vocabulary when Cassel repeated the trouble, Trump's incidental reaction, indeed, was an old river.
Just this old river lake, speaking out is a full-mouth run the train, East Latvian no matter what.
He called himself a "peacemaker", and how much is the book of merits of the seven conflicts?
The core "merit" of Wang's speech is to claim that he has "ended seven conflicts".
It sounds very impressive, but if you look carefully, I'm afraid this credit book is full of water.
India-Pakistan conflict: In May, India dispatched hundreds of fighter planes to raid Pakistan, but the result was an ugly exchange ratio of 6: 0. Pakistani drones even appeared over the capital New Delhi. India's disgraced face can only quickly take the initiative to demand a ceasefire. Trump quickly ran out and said that it was the credit of his "mediation" and was directly beaten in the face by the Indian government. Modi made it clear that the ceasefire had nothing to do with US mediation.
Iran-Israel War: In June, the two sides attacked each other, and the U.S. launched a B-2 bomber to blow up Iran's nuclear facilities, and the conflict was suspended. In Trump's view, it was a "show muscle" peace; but in the outside world, it was clearly oil poured onto the fire, a brief ceasefire achieved by escalation of violence, and endless suffering.
Crise in the Red Sea: The U.S. aircraft carrier squadron fought the Houthi armed forces and was attacked repeatedly, eventually having to negotiate with the Houthi armed forces privately and evacuate from the Red Sea.
Russian-Ukrainian conflict: He boasted about the end of the war for 24 hours, resulting in seven months of intensification of the war. During this General Assembly, he privately expressed his support to Zelensky for Ukraine's "recovery of all territory", which is a persuasion?
What about the other three conflicts? such as Azerbaijan and Armenia, such as the Congo-Kim and Rwanda, which seem to have little to do with him, at most they sold Trump a face, signed an agreement under the witness of the United States, and as for the seventh?
To be honest, in addition to the conflict with Israel, there must be American factors here, the rest, and how much relationship can Trump have?
In his speech, Trump proclaimed that the United States has entered a “golden age” with “the strongest economic, military and spiritual.”
Economically: U.S. farmers have been desperate because of the trade war with China, and since 2025 U.S. soybeans and other agricultural products can no longer get Chinese orders.
Diplomatically: while accusing China and India of buying Russian oil, its own ally system is splintered.The EU complains to him that NATO partners are seen by him as a “payout machine”, forcing the general expenditure to mention 5% of GDP.
On the multilateral stage: He openly declared that “even if more than 150 countries recognize Palestine, I say they are a minority is a minority”.
Ironically, he accuses the United Nations of incompetence, while the United States is the biggest debtor.This is like relying on himself not paying property fees, and in turn accuses the property company of poor service, and makes him alone.
Trump's "unicorn drama" did not change to full glory, but instead met with a hard nuclear response.
Brazilian President Lula directly “wrote his face” and stressed that “our sovereignty is not negotiable” in response to Trump’s remarks about interfering with Brazilian justice.
French President Emmanuel Macron announced France's official recognition of the Palestinian state in the run-up to the meeting, with actions that dismissed Trump's paranoid Israeli policy.
United Nations Secretary-General Guterres also pre-emphasized "isolation screams", stressing that "no country can solve global problems alone", and echoed the face of Trump's "unilateralism".
After the end of the speech, the whole scene was only polite applause, and the atmosphere of this time was only cold silence compared to the laughter of his first speech at the General Assembly in 2017. Everyone seems to have become accustomed to this code, and also see through the pale behind the noise.
Just as Trump “dismantled” the United Nations, the Chinese delegation announced an important decision:
In the future WTO negotiations, China will no longer seek new "special and differential treatment".
What does that mean? It means that China voluntarily gives up some preferential conditions it enjoys as a developing country and gives more resources to other developing countries that need them more. Li Chenggang, Vice Minister of Commerce of China, made it clear that this was to "inject a boost into global trade". In a word, China is setting up a stage for the world, while the United States is smashing the scene.
This contrast can be clearly seen by the international community. Who is creating problems and who is solving them; Who is breaking the rules, who is contributing, and make judgments.
Trump's UN General Assembly show is essentially a well-designed political performance, mainly to tell his voters, with the aim of consolidating the domestic fundamentals and showing the image of a "strongman". But he forgot that the UN is not the Mar-a-Lago, the audience in the audience is not his fans, and everyone will not buy his account.
The world has changed. Unilateral bullying, nonsense, and reneging, this script is becoming more and more unworkable.
Trump’s 57-minute “blasphemy” may have been the last shadow of American hegemony, and after a speech, the United States has not become “greater” but seems more lonely.