Really haven't seen such a "strange" memorial! the husband just got a shot in the neck, the body bones are not cold, the widow at the memorial was face-to-face with the president, the laughter of the mouth corner is not able to hide! Trump still had to secretly send the eye to remind her "there is a camera", this was to squeeze out a few tears.
Speaking of Charlie Kirk, many people in the country are not very familiar with him.He is only 31 years old this year, is the top of the U.S. Conservative youth leaders, founded an organization called "America's turning point" with an incredibly small influence.
The organization, which is specifically active in the university, attracts the younger generation to the Conservative camp and is an iron-bone ally of the Trump campaign team, so when the news of his assassination came out, the entire U.S. right-wing circle exploded.
The murderer was quickly caught, and a man named Taylor Robinson, who claimed to be a “radical leftist”, killed himself because he hated the conservative ideas promoted by Kirk.
But this statement is too simple in the eyes of many people. How can an ordinary "leftist" radical get a high-precision sniper rifle and hit the target from a height at a heavily guarded event site?
Guns are rampant in American society, but to achieve this level of assassination, it is probably not a simple personal hatred behind it. Some people suspect that this may be a conspiracy of the "deep state" aimed at cracking down on the young forces of the Trump camp.
It has also been argued that this may have been planned by certain extremist organizations to incite internal contradictions, but these are only speculations, and the official explanation now given is the murderer’s personal actions out of political hatred.
If the assassination itself is already strange enough, then the next commemoration, but also pushed this show to the climax, according to the practice, this level of commemoration, should be solemn, but this commemoration, but filled with a strange atmosphere.
First, the venue, which can accommodate a stadium of 100,000 people, a strict warning, and even temporarily closed the airspace, Trump personally attended, as well as a group of senior officials such as the vice president, the secretary of state, this battle is said to be a memorial, more like the Trump campaign rally.
Trump spoke on the stage for more than half an hour, from the beginning to the end, almost no mention of comfort to the relatives of the dead, but instead generously chanted the "radical left", calling Kirk a "martyr who sacrificed for American freedom", his words are full of incitement, gunpowder, listen to the supporters underneath a row of cheers, which is sad, on the political stage of the United States, no tragedy can be exploited.
The most puzzling thing is that Kirk's widow Erica, a woman who just lost her beloved, should have been devastated, but when captured by the camera, she seemed surprisingly "excited".
She, on the other hand, claimed that she "does not cry", while announcing on the stage that she will take over the organization left by her deceased husband, it is even more impressive that she said that she has "forgiven the murderer" and even openly opposed the death penalty for the murderer.
This operation is very unusual, a widow who has just lost her husband, while her husband's body is not cold, is busy forgiving her husband's enemy?
At the commemoration, Erika's interaction with Trump, and also sparked public opinion, the camera repeatedly captured Erika and Trump's "eye-eye off", her mouth corner even with a tint of hard to hide laughter.
On such a solemn occasion, this expression was particularly abrupt. The sharp-eyed audience found that Trump seemed to signal her to "converge" with her eyes, so she quickly switched to a sad expression and squeezed out a few tears.
This "emotional drama code", so many people start to open their minds, some speculate, is Erica to use the influence of the deceased man, politically further? and Trump, does not also see the political value of Erica, intends to absorb her into his camp?
In American political circles, this kind of "political marriage" is not uncommon. The political energy behind a young and influential widow and a presidential candidate who urgently needs young votes should not be underestimated. Erica inherited the political legacy of her late husband and continued to lead the "American Turning Point" organization, which in itself is a matter of great political significance.
From the current point of view, the biggest winner is undoubtedly Trump, who used Kirk's assassination to successfully establish himself as the standard bearer of the "anti-radical left" and further consolidated his position among conservative voters.
He transformed a tragedy into a successful campaign rally, shaping the dead into “martyrs who died for freedom,” which not only earned the eye, but also aroused the anger and loyalty of supporters.
And Erica, through this incident, has become a rising star of American conservatives from a "widow of online celebrity". She not only inherited her late husband's political organization, but also gained national attention. Although her behavior is controversial, it is undeniable that she has successfully pushed herself to the center of the political arena.
This "funeral drama" makes people see clearly the coldness and hypocrisy of American politics. In the face of power, there is no real sadness, only eternal interests. In this drama, the real tragedy is not the loss of a young life, but the moral decay of the whole society.
What's your opinion on this? Please leave a comment in the comment section!
Speaking of Charlie Kirk, many people in the country are not very familiar with him.He is only 31 years old this year, is the top of the U.S. Conservative youth leaders, founded an organization called "America's turning point" with an incredibly small influence.
The organization, which is specifically active in the university, attracts the younger generation to the Conservative camp and is an iron-bone ally of the Trump campaign team, so when the news of his assassination came out, the entire U.S. right-wing circle exploded.
The murderer was quickly caught, and a man named Taylor Robinson, who claimed to be a “radical leftist”, killed himself because he hated the conservative ideas promoted by Kirk.
But this statement is too simple in the eyes of many people. How can an ordinary "leftist" radical get a high-precision sniper rifle and hit the target from a height at a heavily guarded event site?
Guns are rampant in American society, but to achieve this level of assassination, it is probably not a simple personal hatred behind it. Some people suspect that this may be a conspiracy of the "deep state" aimed at cracking down on the young forces of the Trump camp.
It has also been argued that this may have been planned by certain extremist organizations to incite internal contradictions, but these are only speculations, and the official explanation now given is the murderer’s personal actions out of political hatred.
If the assassination itself is already strange enough, then the next commemoration, but also pushed this show to the climax, according to the practice, this level of commemoration, should be solemn, but this commemoration, but filled with a strange atmosphere.
First, the venue, which can accommodate a stadium of 100,000 people, a strict warning, and even temporarily closed the airspace, Trump personally attended, as well as a group of senior officials such as the vice president, the secretary of state, this battle is said to be a memorial, more like the Trump campaign rally.
Trump spoke on the stage for more than half an hour, from the beginning to the end, almost no mention of comfort to the relatives of the dead, but instead generously chanted the "radical left", calling Kirk a "martyr who sacrificed for American freedom", his words are full of incitement, gunpowder, listen to the supporters underneath a row of cheers, which is sad, on the political stage of the United States, no tragedy can be exploited.
The most puzzling thing is that Kirk's widow Erica, a woman who just lost her beloved, should have been devastated, but when captured by the camera, she seemed surprisingly "excited".
She, on the other hand, claimed that she "does not cry", while announcing on the stage that she will take over the organization left by her deceased husband, it is even more impressive that she said that she has "forgiven the murderer" and even openly opposed the death penalty for the murderer.
This operation is very unusual, a widow who has just lost her husband, while her husband's body is not cold, is busy forgiving her husband's enemy?
At the commemoration, Erika's interaction with Trump, and also sparked public opinion, the camera repeatedly captured Erika and Trump's "eye-eye off", her mouth corner even with a tint of hard to hide laughter.
On such a solemn occasion, this expression was particularly abrupt. The sharp-eyed audience found that Trump seemed to signal her to "converge" with her eyes, so she quickly switched to a sad expression and squeezed out a few tears.
This "emotional drama code", so many people start to open their minds, some speculate, is Erica to use the influence of the deceased man, politically further? and Trump, does not also see the political value of Erica, intends to absorb her into his camp?
In American political circles, this kind of "political marriage" is not uncommon. The political energy behind a young and influential widow and a presidential candidate who urgently needs young votes should not be underestimated. Erica inherited the political legacy of her late husband and continued to lead the "American Turning Point" organization, which in itself is a matter of great political significance.
From the current point of view, the biggest winner is undoubtedly Trump, who used Kirk's assassination to successfully establish himself as the standard bearer of the "anti-radical left" and further consolidated his position among conservative voters.
He transformed a tragedy into a successful campaign rally, shaping the dead into “martyrs who died for freedom,” which not only earned the eye, but also aroused the anger and loyalty of supporters.
And Erica, through this incident, has become a rising star of American conservatives from a "widow of online celebrity". She not only inherited her late husband's political organization, but also gained national attention. Although her behavior is controversial, it is undeniable that she has successfully pushed herself to the center of the political arena.
This "funeral drama" makes people see clearly the coldness and hypocrisy of American politics. In the face of power, there is no real sadness, only eternal interests. In this drama, the real tragedy is not the loss of a young life, but the moral decay of the whole society.
What's your opinion on this? Please leave a comment in the comment section!