In front of more than 100 leaders, Zelensky named China and Putin, and committed a big taboo.
Taking advantage of the opportunity of the UN General Assembly, leaders of more than 100 countries gathered at the UN headquarters in new york, USA. In today's international situation, fierce confrontation is inevitable.
It is no surprise that Ukrainian President Zelensky personally came out and opened fire on Russian President Putin at the Security Council.
He claims that without China, Putin's Russia is nothing. Russia is now completely dependent on China, and if China really wants to end this war, it will force Moscow to stop its military operations.
Zelensky’s words contain two meanings, one of which is a strong degradation of Putin and Russia, trying to shape the former as a “failed” leader of a country, and the latter as a “falling status of a great power.”
The purpose of this is to dominate the public opinion while fighting against the Russian morale, so as to alleviate the West’s aversion to Russia and thus gain more support.
And the second level of meaning of this word, too, is well understood, is to direct the contradiction towards China.
To put it bluntly, this is actually the so-called old rhetoric of "China supports Russia". Zelensky tried to use this method to forcibly drag China, a third party that has no direct relationship with the Russia-Ukraine conflict, into muddy waters.
His so-called "Russia is nothing without China" remarks are to emphasize China's importance to Russia, so as to rationalize his logic of asking China to take action.
Not only that, Zelensky also intended to point out that “China is also represented here” and wanted to put more pressure on China by means of “nickname”.
However, even if Zelensky rearranged his remarks carefully and added more emotions, it could not change China's attitude to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
China has repeatedly stressed that China is not a direct participant in the Ukrainian crisis, nor is it the culprit behind the Ukrainian crisis, and it is a mistake to direct its head to China.
In addition, China has not provided weapons and equipment to Russia, and the normal development of Sino-Russian relations and normal Sino-Russian cooperation should not be interfered by third parties.
Ukraine is a party to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. As the president of Ukraine, it is not incomprehensible that Zelensky has anxiety and other emotions. However, it is a big mistake to put the idea on China and turn black and white upside down.
As you can imagine, China can absolutely not approve of such behavior. The Chinese representative pointed out that from the first day of the outbreak of the Ukrainian crisis, China has upheld an objective and fair stance, called for a ceasefire and an end to the war, insisted on promoting peace talks, and promoted a political settlement.
At the same time, China also pointed out to Zelensky a clear path that the parties to the conflict should increase efforts, demonstrate political will, demonstrate flexibility, attach importance to and properly resolve each other’s reasonable security concerns, and strive to reach a comprehensive, lasting and binding peace agreement at an early date.
Some people who believe a little bit of reason are well aware that China’s suggestions on resolving the Russian-Ukrainian conflict are the most feasible and effective.
In fact, Zelensky would throw these statements out this time, most likely related to Trump’s shift in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
During the United Nations General Assembly, Trump changed his relatively cautious attitude toward Russia and began to upgrade his speech, arguing that Ukraine, with the financial support of Europe, especially NATO, has the ability to fight in the original way and win "the entire Ukraine".
He also accused Putin of "bad leadership" and threatened to impose high tariffs on Russia.
Moreover, Trump once again turned his head toward China and India, accusing the two countries of providing Russia with so-called “war funding.”
Some media noticed that Trump's statement was made shortly after his meeting with Zelensky. Combined with some similarities in the expressions of the two, it is not difficult for us to guess that the presidents of the United States and Ukraine may want to make the situation develop in the direction that Ukraine and the West want to see through cooperation in actions.
After all, the war has been fought now, and all sides have been somewhat tired.If Ukraine and the West do not hit a dose of "strong needles" from time to time, their own morality will fall.
And for Trump this time mentioned that Ukraine can recover "all territory", Zelensky laughed and surprised. he believed that Trump in "Today understands" that "exchange of territory" is unfair.
It can be predicted that along with Trump’s speech, Zelensky should increase pressure on other countries over the Ukraine issue in the following period.
In addition to accusing Russia as an example, he may also continue to target countries “he thinks” can have an impact on the situation in Russia and Ukraine, such as China.
However, what other countries think is one thing, the Chinese side has spoken about the issue for a long time.In this regard, Zelensky still needs to think carefully about whether some of his remarks about China are actually conducive to China-Ukraine relations and conducive to the resolution of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
It is not easy to say, in some things, the will is meaningless. Only in a practical way, from the point of view of reality, is it possible to get a best result.