It was unbelievable that this time Israel was attacking the Americans.An Israeli air force armed drone strikes southern Lebanon, killing three Lebanese-American children and their father, and seriously injuring their mother (which may have been killed, so five are dead, according to media reports).
According to a report by RIA Novosti, Israel's attack targets have covered eight countries. In a recent military operation, Israel brazenly dropped missiles and attacked southern Lebanon. Unexpectedly, it failed to grasp the scale in the process and killed a five-member American family.
“Who is a citizen?”
For Washington, these possibly existing U.S. passports instantly turned from a national asset that needs to be protected into a hot potato. The United States will immediately turn from a “mediator” or “spectator” of the conflict in the Middle East to a direct victim.。
This means that the United States must make a difficult choice between two options: Either he strongly condemns his Iron Belt ally Israel, or he pretends to be deaf in the face of domestic public opinion.Whichever option, it would seriously impact its strategic balance in the Middle East.
To admit it is tantamount to pushing Israel into the dockThis makes the complicated alliance relationship worse. To deny it is to tell the world the value of American citizens’ lives.On the geopolitical table. Can be revalued。
As a result, we saw the watertight diplomatic rhetoric of the US State Department. This "strategic ambiguity" skillfully avoided an imminent diplomatic crisis for itself.
“More interestingly, someone immediately recalled the executive order signed by US President Trump in January this year, which aims to end certain circumstances.” Birth of citizenshipWhile it’s impossible to say there’s a direct link between the two, this at least indicates that the threshold for citizenship is being tightened in the current American political climate.
When a country begins to redefine "who is a citizen" from the legal level, then in the face of difficult diplomatic events, The “ambiguous” treatment of citizenship for a particular group also seems to be in order.。
A country whose sovereignty has lost its voice
While Washington was playing a word game, Lebanon was playing a more sad drama. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Saleh described the attack as an attack targeting civilians. massacre”， President Joseph Owen accuses Israel of “continuing violations of international resolutions”。
These words are not intense, but they sound extremely empty. Because in stark contrast to these angry condemnations, It is the collective silence of Lebanese government forces in the face of daily Israeli bombing.。
Not only are Israeli airstrikes across borders every day, but they have even begun to build military bases near the village of Hula in southern Lebanon, an act that has long been no longer a piece of military friction, but rather a militancy. systematic abuse of a sovereign state。
The state sovereignty of Lebanon has long been eroded in the sound of gunfire. It seems to have become an arena for all forces to enter and leave at will。
The deeper reason lies in the internal tear of Lebanon. Hezbollah is facing an unprecedented dilemmaWith the collapse of the Assad government in Syria, their supply line for weapons from Iran has been severely hampered. Missiles and drones, these core weapons, really became a valuable resource for "fighting one bit less".。
This may explain why Hezbollah, in the face of Israel’s frequent provocations, has chosen not to be tolerant in recent times.They need to retain their strength to face more severe challenges.These challenges come not only from the outside but also from within. The Lebanese parliament has passed a bill calling for the disarmament of Hezbollah。
There is even a view that the Lebanese government forces have a tacit acquiescence attitude towards Israel's attack on Hezbollah. External blows, to some extent, Just in line with the interests of some factions in the country。
At the same time, the Gulf Cooperation Committee (GCC) even proposed, Demanding the surrender of southern Lebanon to Syrian HTS armed control, the geopolitical game makes Lebanon’s future more obscure。
Who defines injury?
Let's go back to the scene of the attack. The Israeli military issued a statement afterwards admitting that in the operation to eliminate a Hezbollah militant, " Many unrelated civilians were killed.They expressed “deep regret” and pledged to censor the incident.
This is a very skillful set of crisis public relations rhetoric. Pass Admit “Error” and start “Review”Israel is trying to control an event that could constitute a war crime within a manageable “military operation accident” framework.The keyword “accompanied injury” has become a great shield to cover up the truth.
However, the details of the scene are silently refuting this statement. The attack was not just one missile, but two。 One hit the so-called "target"-the militant riding a motorcycle. The other one landed accurately on the civilian Mercedes-Benz next to it.
This operation challenges the notion of “unfortunate”.It is more like an expansionary blow, a predictable, systematic disregard for environmental security. Was it an accident, or was it clearing out the main target and by the way “clearing out” the potential threat or witnesses around?
A statement by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) thoroughly ripped the “accompanied injury” cover.They were “shocked and indignant” at the tragic deaths of three children and condemned with the toughest sentences: The attacks on children are shameless。”
This statement has taken the nature of the incident directly from the military-technical level. Humanitarian and war ethics。 It is no longer a successful or failed "targeted killing", but a barbaric act against innocent lives. The trial of international morality makes Israel's official narrative look pale and weak.
conclusion
This time, even when American citizens were bombed, the United States stood on Israel's side, let alone your Middle Eastern countries?
When the misfortune of an ordinary family comes into conflict with the strategic layout of a superpower, the identity representing nationality and rights may be the first victim.
Regardless of how it is dealt with, the blast will have an impact on U.S. relations, leading directly to the deaths of U.S. citizens, possibly touching the red line. Not only has Netanyahu struck the horse beetle, but he is most concerned now that the U.S. will also adjust the Middle East policy no longer in line with Israel, if the consequences are worse than attacking eight countries.
References: