Preliminary
While the world is still digesting 6: 0 air battle resultPakistan suddenly dropped out. The new card.。
British authority media revealed that the Pakistani military confessed in private War reports are wrong., but not too much, but Less wasThis “later truth” instantly made all the justifications of India pale.
The ArmyWhy did you choose to announce the truth at this time? India isHow will they respond again?
British media suddenly broke the news: the results of the Pakistani army were reported to have "shrunk"
I didn’t think there was a follow-up.
Just when everyone thought that the Indian-Pakistani air war in May had already settled, British famous aviation magazine Monthly Air ForceSuddenly a heavy news came out.
The editor of the magazine, Warren Warren, personally flew to Pakistan and had a deep conversation with the Pakistan Air Force Chief of Staff, Babur, which resulted in a great blast.
The Pakistani side acknowledges that the previously announced outcome is indeed wrong, but this "mistake" is not the kind of exaggeration speculated by the outside world, but Conservative。
Warns made it clear in the report that the number of Indian aircraft losses was more than previously announced, and the Pakistani side even provided. Vertical Number of the Fourth Wind.as evidence .
This news is like throwing huge stones on a quiet lake, instantly stirring a wave of waves.To know, the wind is the star product of the French Dassault Company, allegedly the most advanced four-generation fighter aircraft in Europe.
What is even more interesting is the attitude of Pakistan. Barber told British reporters that the Pakistani army actually Maintain the restraint.If we struggle, India’s losses will be even greater.
It sounds like a face-to-face for India, but in reality it is a more deadly psychological blow.
Speaking of this, the reaction on the side of India was also very interesting, not a few days after the end of the air war, the Indian Air Force ordered all the warplanes. Stop the inspection.The reason is “Routine Maintenance.”
Immediately afterwards, a team of engineers from Dassault flew to New Delhi, nominally a "technical exchange". If it is really zero loss, how can these actions be explained?
Most importantly, the British came out this time to "spell lies", and the motivation behind it was fascinating.To know that the British military presence in the Indo-Pacific region was not strong, the initiative to disclose this short, obviously not so simple as to beat the eye.
How the J-10C turned the wind into "blind"
Technical details determine success or failure. The key to such disparate results in this air battle is that Pakistan has adopted a brand-new Combat mode。
The traditional air combat thinking is "whoever has the more advanced aircraft will win", but this time Pakistan has completely subverted this cognition. The core advantage of the J-10C fighter is not how fast it flies or how much bomb it carries, but its “Silent play”。
Simply put, the fighter aircraft can perform accurate strikes without activating the aircraft-carried radar, relying on the information provided by the external data chain.
It is like a ninja and samurai confrontation, while the warplanes are well equipped, but its combat mindset remains at the level of "single fighting", relying on its own radar and electronic systems to detect enemy aircraft.
The J-10C is like a hidden ninja. Close to the target silently.By the time the other party found out, it was too late.
More importantly, the system synergy capabilities, Pakistan in this operation used a complete operational system consisting of ground radar stations, air early warning aircraft, electronic warplanes and combat aircraft.
All of the F-10Cs are like this. Brain networkA terminal that receives well-processed target information and directly performs a strike task.
Pilots only need to launch missiles according to the instructions, do not worry about target search and threat judgment, and look at the Indian side, although the single jet performance is good, but lack effective system support.
The Falcon Early Warning Aircraft was in charge of the early warning mission. Technical failure delayed takeoffThis resulted in a deadly lack of time for the Indian army in the air condition.
By the time the Indian pilots realized the danger, the Pakistani missiles were already on their way. Warnes specifically mentioned in the report that he witnessed with his own eyes how the Pakistani army's electronic warfare system Cut off the satellite communication link of the Indian army, even the GPS signal is interfered.
This systematic suppression method makes Indian fighter planes blind and deaf when they fly together. The technological generation difference is vividly reflected here. It is not the gap in the equipment itself, but the overall crushing of usage methods and supporting capabilities.
The “Long Line Fishing” is over.
The time to choose the psychological warfare at the level of textbooks, why did the Pakistani side not immediately announce the complete outcome after the air warfare, but instead choose now "supplementary explanations"?
The consideration behind this is quite subtle, just at the end of the air war, the Pakistani side announced the defeat of three aircraft, one Su-30, one MiG-29, has been shocking enough.
India, of course, will not admit that all kinds of denials and protests followed, and the Indian Defense Minister even ran internationally for China. "Ask for explanation"，At this point, the French were unable to sit.
The aircraft as a signature product of the Dassault Company, the news of being shot down directly caused Stock price falls。
In order to save face, the French military quickly released news during the "Atlantic Trident-25" exercise, saying that Rafale "defeated" American F-35 fighter jets during the exercise.
This propaganda campaign did work, and it didn't take long for it to be reported that India was preparing to smash it again $22.6 billion to purchase 114 wind turbinesThe news .
Just when the French and Indians thought the crisis had passed, the Pakistani side suddenly threw out the "war-go correction" card, this timing was quite accurate.
France just blown the wind can win the F-35, India just signed a large amount of arms purchase contract, this time to publish real hammer evidence, equal to the face of the whole world. face to face。
More seriously, the Pakistani side has also specifically emphasized that it has "preserved restraint", demonstrating both military strength and occupying moral heights, a practice that is far more destructive than the announcement of all the outcomes at once.
Because it not only denied India’s excuses, but also led all nations that believed in French propaganda to begin a re-examination of the actual combat capabilities of the army.
It is said that those originally intended to purchase Rafale fighter jets Egyptian ArmyAfter this report, the procurement negotiations have been silently suspended.For Dassault, which is in urgent need of order recovery, this is simply worse.
The Pakistani trick of "fishing the long line" not only proved its strength militarily, but also took precedence in the battlefields of diplomacy and public opinion. The Art of Information Warfare, more clever than pure force deterrence.
Why did an air battle rewrite the rules of the arms world?
The significance of this air battle goes far beyond the tactical level, and it marks that international military evaluation standards are happening fundamental shift。
For a long time, the military in the procurement of equipment mainly value the technical parameters and manufacturer reputation, whose data looks good, whose brands are loud, who can easily get orders.
But the fact that the Indian-Pacific air war was bloody proves, Effect of war.It is the only standard for testing equipment.
The technical parameters of the warplanes are indeed good, and the reputation of the French military industry is loud enough, but the performance in real warfare is a great slide.
In contrast, the J-10C, although it is not the latest five-generation aircraft, but with proper system combat capabilities, it has demonstrated a crushing advantage in real combat.
This comparison brings to the global arms market. Deep impact,Those countries accustomed to "parametric procurement" began to rethink the idea of equipment construction.
Simply buying a few good aircraft is obviously not enough, and more importantly, building a complete operational system, including early warning detection, command control, electronic confrontation and other aspects.
This cognitive change has also had a profound impact on the international military cooperation model. In the past, countries were more willing to buy finished equipment, but now more and more countries are beginning to pay attention to it Technology transfer and localized production。
Because only by mastering the core technology can we carry out system integration according to our actual needs, and Pakistan is a typical example in this respect.
It did not blindly pursue the most advanced equipment, but chose a technical route that suited itself. Through in-depth cooperation with China, it established Complete combat system。
This pragmatic pattern of development is being recognized and imitated by more and more countries, and in a larger pattern, the air war also predicts subtle changes in the international military balance.
The technological monopoly of traditional military powers is challenged, and emerging military forces are achieved through innovative development ideas. "Overtaking in a corner"。
This change is not only reflected in the performance of the equipment, but also in the innovation of the combat concept and development model, the future military competition, the game will be the system integration capabilities and innovative development ideas, rather than a mere comparison of equipment parameters.
conclusion
The real value of this air warfare is not in which aircraft is more advanced, but in who knows the rules of the game of modern warfare.
Future military competition will focus on system integration capabilities, rather than simple comparison of equipment parameters.
In the face of this change, how should countries adjust their military development ideas? Feel free to share your views.