Poland can¡¯t stop China.

Everyone knows that the China-Europe freight train was blocked on the Polish border. The cause was the spillover of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Poland closed all ports on the border with Belarus on the grounds of self-protection. The China-Europe freight train passing through the Polish-Belarus border was not spared.

At the critical moment, Foreign Minister Wang Yi went to Poland in person, which made the other party relax and agreed to release the China-Europe train. Unexpectedly, the Polish side kept an eye on it. Although it promised Foreign Minister Wang Yi, it didn't say when to open the border. It only said that it would wait until the security threat was completely lifted, and it wanted to fool it with a bad check.

Poland thinks it will get more benefits. After all, Foreign Minister Wang Yi is not going empty-handed. If the China-Europe train is not released for a day, China will be even more anxious.

However, their abacus was wrong. When the Chinese side heard this, it didn't hesitate at all, and decisively turned its attention to the Arctic waterway, resolutely refusing to quarrel with Poland. There is not only one way from China to Europe. Since Poland doesn't keep its word, just change the route. There is no need to be handled by Poland because of this matter.

Last Friday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs showed the attitude that China hopes with all parties to jointly develop the construction of the Arctic route. This Monday, China-European Arctic Express officially opened, from Zhejiang Ningbo directly to the British port, it takes only 18 days, more than a week faster than China-European flights, compared to the traditional Suez routes and Africa's Good Hope routes, it saves more than twenty days, is more convenient and convenient.

Of course, there is some uncertainty in the Arctic route, influenced by temperatures, seasons and other factors, but these uncertainty will gradually be overcome as global warming and technology improve.

Besides, it is impossible for Poland to not open its borders all their lives. Even if they are willing to bear the losses themselves, other European countries will not agree. You know, the goods transported by China-Europe trains are related to the supply chains of many European companies. After a long time, Europe can't stand it.

In the long run, China and Europe have also brought awakening to other countries, and the vulnerability of the trade supply chain is also rising in the face of the worsening global security situation.In addition to considering the time and economic costs of the route, security is the first to consider geopolitical conflict.

We can't control the affairs of other countries. We can only find a few more routes. If one fails, we will take the other route to avoid being stuck in the neck. We have to find a few more baskets of eggs to share, so as to minimize the risk.

As for Poland, for a little bit of flute, they made articles on the Central European list, entirely with a mouse¡¯s eye. They did so for two reasons: one was to demonstrate to Russia and Belarus, and the other was to get more benefits from China.

China has demonstrated its willingness to negotiate, but since Poland is uncomfortable, then of course we should choose a shorter and cheaper Central European Arctic route, and Russia will not be scared by this little trick of Poland, and only Poland and Europe will ultimately suffer.

When the Arctic waterway is more mature, Poland will lose not only tolls, but also its reputation as a transit hub for Sino-European trade. Whether it's a country, an enterprise, or an individual, reputation is the most important thing. Without reputation, who wants to cooperate with you?

It can only be said that Poland's behavior of harming others and not benefiting itself will only shoot itself in the foot in the end. It's better to stop the loss in time before it causes a catastrophe, so as not to regret it when you get it.