Netanyahu threatening to bomb China? In front of the largest group of American congressional members in history, he declared that Israel would use "its own methods" to confront China! Given that the only way for Israel to solve the problem is to bomb, netizens around the world are asking: Is he going to bomb China?
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner and click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you more quality content, thank you for your support!
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rarely spoken a loud word, claiming to fight China "in his own way."This statement, as by the media, immediately sparked a global public debate, and has even been interpreted as "Israel is prepared to bomb China."
However, if you look deeper into the background, you will find that this is not a simple diplomatic provocation, but Netanyahu’s political statement in multiple difficulties, a high-crisis bet to shift domestic contradictions and consolidate the power foundation.
From an economic perspective, Israel is experiencing a rare cycle of weakness. In the first quarter of 2025, its GDP grew by just 1.2%, the worst record in nearly five years.
High defence spending slows the budgets, and the weekly military operations in Gaza consume enough money to feed the livelihoods of three small and medium-sized cities for a whole year.
At the same time, the "judicial reform" promoted by Netanyahu last year triggered unprecedented protests in China, which led to serious social divisions. His support rate once fell to 32%, and his political status was in jeopardy. In this situation, he needs an external focus large enough to direct social dissatisfaction to external enemies, so as to ease internal pressure and strive for breathing space.
The move of the United States was not merely “friendly.” This 250-member parliamentary assembly was not only the rare “Middle East Group building” in the history of the U.S. Congress, but also a strategic persuasion and pressure.
China’s significant rise in influence in the Middle East over the past year has led to reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the signing of a hundred-billion-dollar oil yuan agreement, and the construction of new energy industrial parks in the UAE, all undermining American traditional influence.
Washington needs a regional ally to publicly confront China to prevent the trend of "multipolarization" from accelerating further, and Israel is undoubtedly the most suitable pawn.
But the problem is that China-Israel economic relations have been deeply tied. In 2024, the bilateral trade volume will exceed US $22 billion, and China will firmly remain Israel's third largest trading partner.
Israeli pharmaceutical giant Teva Pharmaceuticals has nearly 18% of its revenue from the Chinese market; China is the largest overseas buyer of Israel's proud semiconductor testing equipment, agricultural drones, and security systems.
Once Israel has taken hostile measures against China, China will be able to put pressure on it by reducing its procurement, which will lead to sharp declines in Israeli exports, large corporate bankruptcies, and a decline in employment rates, directly impacting its economic roots.Israel economic experts have warned that if the Chinese market closes, Israel’s technology start-up financing chain will break within six months, and its innovation system will be deadly hit.
More seriously, Israel has always been proud of the "technological power" status, in fact, in the key link is highly dependent on China. core control chip of irrigation technology 60% comes from Chinese suppliers; the Israeli star company StoreDot developed the "5 minute fast charging battery" key materials completely depend on the Ninth era; even the Israeli military drone navigation chip, there are a lot from China.
In other words, if China cuts off supplying key components, Israel's so-called technological advantage may collapse in an instant. The American media "Wall Street Journal" bluntly stated: "Israel's technological aura is built on China's supply chain. Threatening China is like self-harming with weapons made in China."
In the geopolitical chess of the Middle East, Israel’s move also appears to be isolated and helpless: Saudi Arabia has agreed with China on the first project of the Middle East railway network and has directly excluded Israel from the list of cooperation; the UAE has raised its share of crude oil exports to China to 45%, for the first time exceeding its total exports to Europe and the United States; and Qatar has signed a 27-year LNG contract with China, treating China as a “long-term meal”.
It can be said that in addition to Israel, the main countries of the Middle East are actively approaching China and seeking a mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation model.In this big trend, Israel's "contra-China" strategy is no different from the backstream, not only does it not get the support of the regional countries, but may also accelerate the risk of isolation.
Netanyahu's "malicious words" are more like a political performance to the country than a real strategic choice. He needs to create the image of a tough leader in the chaotic domestic situation, so as to unite supporters and suppress the opposition. However, the price of this behavior is likely to make Israel's international situation more passive, suffering 800 economic losses and being embattled on all sides diplomatically.
Source: The US Wall Street Journal: September 2025 commented that Israel’s threat to China “is like holding borrowed weapons and targeting its suppliers,” referring directly to the contradiction between its technological dependence and its political statements.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner and click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you more quality content, thank you for your support!
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rarely spoken a loud word, claiming to fight China "in his own way."This statement, as by the media, immediately sparked a global public debate, and has even been interpreted as "Israel is prepared to bomb China."
However, if you look deeper into the background, you will find that this is not a simple diplomatic provocation, but Netanyahu’s political statement in multiple difficulties, a high-crisis bet to shift domestic contradictions and consolidate the power foundation.
From an economic perspective, Israel is experiencing a rare cycle of weakness. In the first quarter of 2025, its GDP grew by just 1.2%, the worst record in nearly five years.
High defence spending slows the budgets, and the weekly military operations in Gaza consume enough money to feed the livelihoods of three small and medium-sized cities for a whole year.
At the same time, the "judicial reform" promoted by Netanyahu last year triggered unprecedented protests in China, which led to serious social divisions. His support rate once fell to 32%, and his political status was in jeopardy. In this situation, he needs an external focus large enough to direct social dissatisfaction to external enemies, so as to ease internal pressure and strive for breathing space.
The move of the United States was not merely “friendly.” This 250-member parliamentary assembly was not only the rare “Middle East Group building” in the history of the U.S. Congress, but also a strategic persuasion and pressure.
China’s significant rise in influence in the Middle East over the past year has led to reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the signing of a hundred-billion-dollar oil yuan agreement, and the construction of new energy industrial parks in the UAE, all undermining American traditional influence.
Washington needs a regional ally to publicly confront China to prevent the trend of "multipolarization" from accelerating further, and Israel is undoubtedly the most suitable pawn.
But the problem is that China-Israel economic relations have been deeply tied. In 2024, the bilateral trade volume will exceed US $22 billion, and China will firmly remain Israel's third largest trading partner.
Israeli pharmaceutical giant Teva Pharmaceuticals has nearly 18% of its revenue from the Chinese market; China is the largest overseas buyer of Israel's proud semiconductor testing equipment, agricultural drones, and security systems.
Once Israel has taken hostile measures against China, China will be able to put pressure on it by reducing its procurement, which will lead to sharp declines in Israeli exports, large corporate bankruptcies, and a decline in employment rates, directly impacting its economic roots.Israel economic experts have warned that if the Chinese market closes, Israel’s technology start-up financing chain will break within six months, and its innovation system will be deadly hit.
More seriously, Israel has always been proud of the "technological power" status, in fact, in the key link is highly dependent on China. core control chip of irrigation technology 60% comes from Chinese suppliers; the Israeli star company StoreDot developed the "5 minute fast charging battery" key materials completely depend on the Ninth era; even the Israeli military drone navigation chip, there are a lot from China.
In other words, if China cuts off supplying key components, Israel's so-called technological advantage may collapse in an instant. The American media "Wall Street Journal" bluntly stated: "Israel's technological aura is built on China's supply chain. Threatening China is like self-harming with weapons made in China."
In the geopolitical chess of the Middle East, Israel’s move also appears to be isolated and helpless: Saudi Arabia has agreed with China on the first project of the Middle East railway network and has directly excluded Israel from the list of cooperation; the UAE has raised its share of crude oil exports to China to 45%, for the first time exceeding its total exports to Europe and the United States; and Qatar has signed a 27-year LNG contract with China, treating China as a “long-term meal”.
It can be said that in addition to Israel, the main countries of the Middle East are actively approaching China and seeking a mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation model.In this big trend, Israel's "contra-China" strategy is no different from the backstream, not only does it not get the support of the regional countries, but may also accelerate the risk of isolation.
Netanyahu's "malicious words" are more like a political performance to the country than a real strategic choice. He needs to create the image of a tough leader in the chaotic domestic situation, so as to unite supporters and suppress the opposition. However, the price of this behavior is likely to make Israel's international situation more passive, suffering 800 economic losses and being embattled on all sides diplomatically.
Source: The US Wall Street Journal: September 2025 commented that Israel’s threat to China “is like holding borrowed weapons and targeting its suppliers,” referring directly to the contradiction between its technological dependence and its political statements.