The US vice president this year had hinted that China, if it does not accept tariffs to consider war, who hasn't spoken out, Chinese professor Gao Zhi Ke was in the international debate, a word to his mouth: just say this, the United States will dare to come, then we will dare to fight with the United States.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
In the words of Gao Zhiqi, the atmosphere of the scene was instantly solidified, the American representatives clearly stood down, and no one dared to provocate any more on the debate field. This matter, people can see very clearly, the international game, not screaming a few harsh words can scare the opponent, China has strength, there is also strategy.
Speaking at the economic level, the moment the U.S. vice president spoke, it seemed to be emphasizing tariff measures, but the signal Gokchee sent was clear: China is no longer the economy that is vulnerable to sanctions and threats.
In recent years, China's economic resilience has significantly improved, and the upper and downstream industrial chain is accelerating its autonomy, from core technology, supply chain security, to financial market regulation, China has sufficient buffering capabilities to cope with external shocks.
In other words, if the United States thinks that the threat of tariffs can shake China, it completely underestimates China's economic resilience and policy response capabilities.
Besides, at the level of rules, many people think that international rules are just words on paper, but they are not. In Professor Gao Zhikai's eyes, rules are the bottom line.
China not only adheres to the rules of international trade, but is better at using the rules to defend its own interests.The United States wants to use threats to force China to make concessions, first hit the red line of the rules, you can scream, but you have to have a basis.
It is like a debate, the United States can scream "we are strong", but when Cao Zhi Kay stands out to point out the bottom line, the whole logic turns.
There is also technological autonomy, which is an important factor in highlighting the bottom line. In the past, the United States has a lot of export control over key technologies and core components, and is delusional to block China's economic vitality.
But now, China has made breakthroughs in the fields of semiconductors, communications, artificial intelligence, aerospace, etc., and its domestic substitution capabilities continue to improve.
If the threat from the United States falls to the technical level, the impact will certainly exist, but China is no longer the one at the mercy of others. Gao Zhikai's phrase "If you dare to come, you dare to fight" is not a casual shout, but a rational judgment based on the triple shield of economy, rules and technology.
When the US Vice President speaks, he is present with a clear height, as if China could only seek reconciliation in the face of tariffs.
And the firm and clear response of Gao Zhiqi, let the whole scene completely reverse, who is the real passive? who has the initiative? China not only dares to say, but also dares to do, the bottom line and logic are on the table.
This contrast is evident, on the one hand, with threats and unilateral thinking, and on the other hand, with a rational response of self-confidence and a consciousness of rules.
This trade wave, in fact, reveals a signal that the game of great powers is not only a match of economic indicators and military strength, but also a comprehensive confrontation of rule consciousness, strategic thinking and technical reserves.
Professor Gao Zhikai's response made the outside world see that China's bottom line was clear, and it would neither compromise easily nor take unnecessary advances. On the international stage, dare to speak and do, but there is data, rules and strategic support behind it. This is the real demonstration of strength.
By the way, this also reminds observers at home and abroad of common sense. In the face of pressure and threats, many slogans are shouted, but what can really silence opponents is the long-term accumulated strength and clear bottom line.
Professor Gao Zhikai's sentence in the debate seems short, but it represents the comprehensive strength of years of economic construction, technological breakthroughs and system improvement. It's not bragging, it's truth.
Another interesting point in this matter is psychological warfare and public opinion warfare. The Vice President of the United States tried to create panic through verbal pressure, but Gao Zhikai responded with rationality and confidence, directly reversing the psychological warfare situation.
This shows that no matter how complicated the international economy is, confidence and logic are the most effective "weapons". The opponent can shout, but you don't panic. This is the initiative.
Professor Gao Zhikai's words not only scolded the vice president of the United States, but also taught all those who pay attention to Sino-US relations a lesson. The game between big powers does not rely on intimidation and strength, and does not rely on slogans and comprehensive layout.
China’s accumulation of economic, technological, and rules makes the threat no longer terrifying, makes the bottom line clearer, and makes the initiative firmly in its own hands.
There is no shortcut to international games. What can really make others respect you, fear you and take you seriously is always the combination of strength and rules, rather than simple threats or clamors.
The firm response of Professor Gao Zhiqi is the vivid demonstration of China's underground, dare to do, not reckless, but the unity of reason and power. The United States can scream, but China has the bottom line, has strength, has wisdom, that is enough.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
In the words of Gao Zhiqi, the atmosphere of the scene was instantly solidified, the American representatives clearly stood down, and no one dared to provocate any more on the debate field. This matter, people can see very clearly, the international game, not screaming a few harsh words can scare the opponent, China has strength, there is also strategy.
Speaking at the economic level, the moment the U.S. vice president spoke, it seemed to be emphasizing tariff measures, but the signal Gokchee sent was clear: China is no longer the economy that is vulnerable to sanctions and threats.
In recent years, China's economic resilience has significantly improved, and the upper and downstream industrial chain is accelerating its autonomy, from core technology, supply chain security, to financial market regulation, China has sufficient buffering capabilities to cope with external shocks.
In other words, if the United States thinks that the threat of tariffs can shake China, it completely underestimates China's economic resilience and policy response capabilities.
Besides, at the level of rules, many people think that international rules are just words on paper, but they are not. In Professor Gao Zhikai's eyes, rules are the bottom line.
China not only adheres to the rules of international trade, but is better at using the rules to defend its own interests.The United States wants to use threats to force China to make concessions, first hit the red line of the rules, you can scream, but you have to have a basis.
It is like a debate, the United States can scream "we are strong", but when Cao Zhi Kay stands out to point out the bottom line, the whole logic turns.
There is also technological autonomy, which is an important factor in highlighting the bottom line. In the past, the United States has a lot of export control over key technologies and core components, and is delusional to block China's economic vitality.
But now, China has made breakthroughs in the fields of semiconductors, communications, artificial intelligence, aerospace, etc., and its domestic substitution capabilities continue to improve.
If the threat from the United States falls to the technical level, the impact will certainly exist, but China is no longer the one at the mercy of others. Gao Zhikai's phrase "If you dare to come, you dare to fight" is not a casual shout, but a rational judgment based on the triple shield of economy, rules and technology.
When the US Vice President speaks, he is present with a clear height, as if China could only seek reconciliation in the face of tariffs.
And the firm and clear response of Gao Zhiqi, let the whole scene completely reverse, who is the real passive? who has the initiative? China not only dares to say, but also dares to do, the bottom line and logic are on the table.
This contrast is evident, on the one hand, with threats and unilateral thinking, and on the other hand, with a rational response of self-confidence and a consciousness of rules.
This trade wave, in fact, reveals a signal that the game of great powers is not only a match of economic indicators and military strength, but also a comprehensive confrontation of rule consciousness, strategic thinking and technical reserves.
Professor Gao Zhikai's response made the outside world see that China's bottom line was clear, and it would neither compromise easily nor take unnecessary advances. On the international stage, dare to speak and do, but there is data, rules and strategic support behind it. This is the real demonstration of strength.
By the way, this also reminds observers at home and abroad of common sense. In the face of pressure and threats, many slogans are shouted, but what can really silence opponents is the long-term accumulated strength and clear bottom line.
Professor Gao Zhikai's sentence in the debate seems short, but it represents the comprehensive strength of years of economic construction, technological breakthroughs and system improvement. It's not bragging, it's truth.
Another interesting point in this matter is psychological warfare and public opinion warfare. The Vice President of the United States tried to create panic through verbal pressure, but Gao Zhikai responded with rationality and confidence, directly reversing the psychological warfare situation.
This shows that no matter how complicated the international economy is, confidence and logic are the most effective "weapons". The opponent can shout, but you don't panic. This is the initiative.
Professor Gao Zhikai's words not only scolded the vice president of the United States, but also taught all those who pay attention to Sino-US relations a lesson. The game between big powers does not rely on intimidation and strength, and does not rely on slogans and comprehensive layout.
China’s accumulation of economic, technological, and rules makes the threat no longer terrifying, makes the bottom line clearer, and makes the initiative firmly in its own hands.
There is no shortcut to international games. What can really make others respect you, fear you and take you seriously is always the combination of strength and rules, rather than simple threats or clamors.
The firm response of Professor Gao Zhiqi is the vivid demonstration of China's underground, dare to do, not reckless, but the unity of reason and power. The United States can scream, but China has the bottom line, has strength, has wisdom, that is enough.