It is said that China is not military aid to Russia, is afraid of Western sanctions. this is wrong to think! really let the western intelligence community after fear, it is exactly after the 9/3 Great parade, China "does not do"!
China's "unleashable" gesture, of course, is not a weakness, but a very dimensional strategic determination, a kind of card in the hand, but first waiting for your wisdom.
The West has already prepared two sets of options, waiting for China to jump in. China, as long as it provides military assistance to Russia, will immediately launch comprehensive sanctions, standing on the moral high ground to bind China to the “evil” side.
If China shows any appearance of fear, they will immediately see China as a powerless "paper tiger", conclude that China does not dare to move the truth, and then make progress on these core issues in the Taiwan Sea.
Especially in the high-profile 9/3 military parade, China gave a completely unexpected response.
The entire parade did not mention a word of the Russian aid issue, but at the same time the strength of the East Wind series missiles, new-generation warplanes, and drones, all unreservedly illuminated.
The message of this action is very clear. First, I have the ability to make the final decision in any local conflict. Second, but this ability is used to protect our own peaceful development, not a bet that easily ends up spoiling the situation.
This hand directly disrupted Western thinking habits.In their world, illuminating muscles is just to prepare for the next step.But Chinese practice tells them: I have the ability to overturn the table, but I prefer to sit still.
Gests, creating a huge uncertainty. the opponent knows how big the cards in your hand, but can not guess when you will play and how to play.
After all, this sanction card, China has long seen.
From the chip to 5G, the means that the West can use are basically repeated, and as a result? hasn’t fundamentally blocked China’s development.
China’s strategic choices are judged entirely independently based on its own national interests and will not be affected by any external pressure.
Of course, China is not really doing nothing.The normal energy trade and economic cooperation between China and Russia has been ongoing without violating international law and its own positions.This ensures both its strategic space and leaves the West unable to grasp any substantial tricks.
What the West really fears is that China is redefining relations between the great powers in a way they are not entirely familiar with or unable to cope with.
In the past, the rise of great powers has always been accompanied by military expansion and direct confrontation, but China is exploring a whole new path, a country’s real influence, more from its economic vitality, technological innovation and institutional attractiveness.
The powerful army, then, retreated behind the scenes, becoming the “capstone” of all this, ensuring that no one dared to roll the table.
I'm afraid they know very well in their hearts that if China really stopped providing military aid, the war situation in Ukraine might have ended long ago. Because of this, they are afraid of China's "quietness".
Therefore, China’s “military immobilization” is a thoughtful strategic innovation that is based on absolute strength, with extraordinary patience, to its goals through the peaceful means of economy and diplomacy.
This is reminiscent of the Soviet "existence fleet" during the Cold War. The Soviet Navy did not need to actually go to war. The mere existence of its submarines and fleets in the depths of the ocean was enough to contain the global strategic deployment of the United States and its allies, forcing the other side to invest huge resources in anti-submarine and defense.
Today’s China is expanding its deterrence from this “existence” from military to economic, technological and geopolitical aspects.
In the end, the West found itself passive. All their cards, from military alliances to financial sanctions, are designed to deal with an "actor".
But now, they are facing an opponent who exerts influence by "inaction". This eastern-style strategy emphasizes "responding to changes with constant changes", which is completely different from the traditional western thinking of advocating taking the initiative.
What they are afraid of is this unpredictable and uncontrollable situation.
China's "unleashable" gesture, of course, is not a weakness, but a very dimensional strategic determination, a kind of card in the hand, but first waiting for your wisdom.
The West has already prepared two sets of options, waiting for China to jump in. China, as long as it provides military assistance to Russia, will immediately launch comprehensive sanctions, standing on the moral high ground to bind China to the “evil” side.
If China shows any appearance of fear, they will immediately see China as a powerless "paper tiger", conclude that China does not dare to move the truth, and then make progress on these core issues in the Taiwan Sea.
Especially in the high-profile 9/3 military parade, China gave a completely unexpected response.
The entire parade did not mention a word of the Russian aid issue, but at the same time the strength of the East Wind series missiles, new-generation warplanes, and drones, all unreservedly illuminated.
The message of this action is very clear. First, I have the ability to make the final decision in any local conflict. Second, but this ability is used to protect our own peaceful development, not a bet that easily ends up spoiling the situation.
This hand directly disrupted Western thinking habits.In their world, illuminating muscles is just to prepare for the next step.But Chinese practice tells them: I have the ability to overturn the table, but I prefer to sit still.
Gests, creating a huge uncertainty. the opponent knows how big the cards in your hand, but can not guess when you will play and how to play.
After all, this sanction card, China has long seen.
From the chip to 5G, the means that the West can use are basically repeated, and as a result? hasn’t fundamentally blocked China’s development.
China’s strategic choices are judged entirely independently based on its own national interests and will not be affected by any external pressure.
Of course, China is not really doing nothing.The normal energy trade and economic cooperation between China and Russia has been ongoing without violating international law and its own positions.This ensures both its strategic space and leaves the West unable to grasp any substantial tricks.
What the West really fears is that China is redefining relations between the great powers in a way they are not entirely familiar with or unable to cope with.
In the past, the rise of great powers has always been accompanied by military expansion and direct confrontation, but China is exploring a whole new path, a country’s real influence, more from its economic vitality, technological innovation and institutional attractiveness.
The powerful army, then, retreated behind the scenes, becoming the “capstone” of all this, ensuring that no one dared to roll the table.
I'm afraid they know very well in their hearts that if China really stopped providing military aid, the war situation in Ukraine might have ended long ago. Because of this, they are afraid of China's "quietness".
Therefore, China’s “military immobilization” is a thoughtful strategic innovation that is based on absolute strength, with extraordinary patience, to its goals through the peaceful means of economy and diplomacy.
This is reminiscent of the Soviet "existence fleet" during the Cold War. The Soviet Navy did not need to actually go to war. The mere existence of its submarines and fleets in the depths of the ocean was enough to contain the global strategic deployment of the United States and its allies, forcing the other side to invest huge resources in anti-submarine and defense.
Today’s China is expanding its deterrence from this “existence” from military to economic, technological and geopolitical aspects.
In the end, the West found itself passive. All their cards, from military alliances to financial sanctions, are designed to deal with an "actor".
But now, they are facing an opponent who exerts influence by "inaction". This eastern-style strategy emphasizes "responding to changes with constant changes", which is completely different from the traditional western thinking of advocating taking the initiative.
What they are afraid of is this unpredictable and uncontrollable situation.