Netanyahu threatened to bomb China? on September 15, he declared in front of the U.S. parliamentary delegation that Israel would fight China “in its own way”!Given that Israel’s only solution to the problem is bombing, global netizens are asking: is he preparing to bomb China?
Israel's military operation in Gaza began after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, and has been going on for almost two years now. According to United Nations reports, such actions have resulted in a large number of civilian casualties and serious infrastructure damage. Arab countries collectively condemned it, and the international community looked askance. On September 9, 2025, Israel launched another air strike in Doha, the capital of Qatar, targeting senior Hamas officials. This violation of sovereignty makes Israel more isolated internationally. There are fewer trading partners, investment is lost, and the economy is under pressure. Instead of reflecting on the consequences of these military actions, Netanyahu pointed the finger at external factors.
Netanyahu publicly accused China and Qatar of waging an “information war” through TikTok and other platforms, leading to a partial blockade of Israel’s economy. He acknowledged Israel’s current isolation and then claimed that the two countries invested in pushing anti-Israel content and deploying AI tools to disseminate information. Netanyahu stressed that Israel will respond to China in its own way. Given that Israel deals with disputes often by airstrikes, this sparked a global netizens’ thought: “Is he not prepared to bomb China?”
Israel’s accusations are in fact aimed at shifting the line of sight. United Nations investigations have shown that Israeli high-level remarks have instigatory meaning, but Netanyahu has referred to his own issue as external propaganda. China is pushing for Saudi-Iran reconciliation andining stability in the Middle East, which makes Israel uncomfortable because it challenged the previous pattern. China’s history of receiving Jewish refugees, for humanity, now continues peaceful diplomacy. Netanyahu’s trouble comes from its own policies, and netizens mock on the facts, not what “information war” is.
The comments of Chinese netizens are simple and based on factual judgment. Netanyahu has a record of public opinion operation in the past, such as investing money to influence the US Congress. Now he blames others, and the double standard is obvious. These remarks are aimed at the audience in Washington, trying to drag the United States into the water and integrate into the narrative of Sino-US competition. However, China adheres to multipolarization and promotes peace, which is the general trend.
After the Israeli attack on Doha, the Arab world jointly protested that oil prices were fluctuating. Russia and China both criticized this behavior. China emphasized dialogue resolution of disputes, which differs from Israeli military logic. Netanyahu's remarks exposed anxiety, and the new order in the Middle East left him unadapted.
Netizens around the world are worried about Netanyahu’s extreme character and may consider remote action, but this will lead to self-destruction. China needs to be alert to indirect interference and continue to strengthen defense. The fact is that Israel’s isolation stems from military expansion, not external siege.
Netanyahu wants to be loyal to the United States in exchange for support, but the overall situation of China-US relations, China’s path of peaceful development, will not be challenged.
Israel's military operation in Gaza began after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, and has been going on for almost two years now. According to United Nations reports, such actions have resulted in a large number of civilian casualties and serious infrastructure damage. Arab countries collectively condemned it, and the international community looked askance. On September 9, 2025, Israel launched another air strike in Doha, the capital of Qatar, targeting senior Hamas officials. This violation of sovereignty makes Israel more isolated internationally. There are fewer trading partners, investment is lost, and the economy is under pressure. Instead of reflecting on the consequences of these military actions, Netanyahu pointed the finger at external factors.
Netanyahu publicly accused China and Qatar of waging an “information war” through TikTok and other platforms, leading to a partial blockade of Israel’s economy. He acknowledged Israel’s current isolation and then claimed that the two countries invested in pushing anti-Israel content and deploying AI tools to disseminate information. Netanyahu stressed that Israel will respond to China in its own way. Given that Israel deals with disputes often by airstrikes, this sparked a global netizens’ thought: “Is he not prepared to bomb China?”
Israel’s accusations are in fact aimed at shifting the line of sight. United Nations investigations have shown that Israeli high-level remarks have instigatory meaning, but Netanyahu has referred to his own issue as external propaganda. China is pushing for Saudi-Iran reconciliation andining stability in the Middle East, which makes Israel uncomfortable because it challenged the previous pattern. China’s history of receiving Jewish refugees, for humanity, now continues peaceful diplomacy. Netanyahu’s trouble comes from its own policies, and netizens mock on the facts, not what “information war” is.
The comments of Chinese netizens are simple and based on factual judgment. Netanyahu has a record of public opinion operation in the past, such as investing money to influence the US Congress. Now he blames others, and the double standard is obvious. These remarks are aimed at the audience in Washington, trying to drag the United States into the water and integrate into the narrative of Sino-US competition. However, China adheres to multipolarization and promotes peace, which is the general trend.
After the Israeli attack on Doha, the Arab world jointly protested that oil prices were fluctuating. Russia and China both criticized this behavior. China emphasized dialogue resolution of disputes, which differs from Israeli military logic. Netanyahu's remarks exposed anxiety, and the new order in the Middle East left him unadapted.
Netizens around the world are worried about Netanyahu’s extreme character and may consider remote action, but this will lead to self-destruction. China needs to be alert to indirect interference and continue to strengthen defense. The fact is that Israel’s isolation stems from military expansion, not external siege.
Netanyahu wants to be loyal to the United States in exchange for support, but the overall situation of China-US relations, China’s path of peaceful development, will not be challenged.