Iran fights the United States and is completely defeated!
North Korea fights against the United States and is completely defeated!
Cuba against the United States, completely defeated!
Venezuela against the United States, completely defeated!
Russia versus the United States, a tie!
They mistakenly think that they all think that they are fighting against the United States for China! Actually: China is the last one for them!
These "confrontations" have one thing in common. They all thought they were competing with the United States, but in fact they became the "front row players" on the geopolitical chessboard. The ones who fought the most fiercely were not the ones with the biggest fists, but the ones who were easiest to be pushed out to keep out the wind.
They imagine themselves as “reversal fighters,” but most of the time, they are testing water for others.
Since the revolution, Iran has turned against the United States in an all-round way. The United States has frozen assets, cut off technology and imposed joint sanctions. Iran refuses to accept it, engages in nuclear programs, assists militias, and closes the strait.
In the past few decades, Iran’s nuclear program has failed to form, the economy has been paralyzed in two rounds, inflation has broken, currency devaluation, youth unemployment, and street protests are constant.
But if something happens, someone will always say, “China will support you.”
So is North Korea. From the Cold War to today, North Korea has been a high-profile representative of "confronting the United States". Every time it tests missiles and confronts military exercises, it will become the global focus.
But the reality is that North Korea's perennial blockade and lack of trade depend on China's energy, electricity and food support. Even so, the DPRK often calls itself an "Asian pioneer", as if it were taking the lead for anyone. In fact, no one asked them to fight this battle.
Cuba is more extreme, Che Guevara said at the time to "allow the fire of the global revolution", resulting in the Cuban people trapped in decades of embargo, the U.S. blockade, European views, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, food once relied on "special confession".
To this day, Cuba remains one of the only countries in the world to support their livelihoods with an egg-to-egg card, but at some international conferences, Cuban representatives still shout, “We stand with the countries of the East!” and the day is getting more and more difficult.
Venezuela used to be one of the richest countries in Latin America, living on oil, and once threatened that "Latin America should be independent of the US dollar system". However, as soon as the oil price fell, domestic corruption, inflation and people's livelihood problems broke out. Now, millions of people are fleeing, and domestic paper money is sold as waste paper.
The government is still screaming with the United States, saying “not afraid of sanctions” in their mouths, but is looking for Chinese loans behind them, which have a common misconception.
I always think that I am playing the vanguard on the front of "fighting against American imperialism", as if I were "standing up" for China, but in fact, China has never let them be spokesmen, and they jumped in by themselves.
China's diplomacy has always spoken of "non-interference, win-win cooperation", never actively demanded that anyone go "against the United States", and never engaged in military alliances, with Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and China haveined cooperation, but rarely high-profile stands.
With help, with conditions, with cooperation, with rules, China is more like a cautious businessman, not a fierce boxer.
Russia is an exception, after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia's high tone "de-Westernization", almost completely turning to the East, but even so, China has alwaysined the gesture of "neutral cooperation", has not directly supported military, nor joined sanctions.
This is not indifference, but sobriety. Russia is not small. It can bear it by itself, can't, and won't drag anyone into the water.
As for why these countries always feel that "China will support at the end", on the one hand, is the hope, the United States is too strong, they cannot carry, they can only find a "seeming able to resist" rise, China has become the "looking most like a mountain" country.
On the other hand, it is a misunderstanding. They regard China's economic aid and infrastructure investment as "political endorsement", but there is a big difference between the two.
For example, China engages in energy projects in Iran for oil returns, not to help it fight against the United States. China invests in minerals in Venezuela for resource allocation, not to make it challenge the US dollar.
China builds bridges and paves roads in North Korea for border stability, not for military alliances. In a word, it is cooperation, not alliance.
The world is a big market, not an arena, some countries like to shout slogans on the table, some countries are more willing to buy and sell on the table, and the slogans often attract applause, but the day is the hardest, and the silence of buying and selling is not sound, but can steadily put the dish on the table.
China has never been a drummer on the stage, but an accountant off the stage. Fighting is not a game, and confrontation is not a movie.
Countries that can really go far are not those that shout the loudest, but those that calculate the clearest. Those countries that think they are "resisting the United States for China" are often the first to be hurt, while China never lets anyone "block the gun" for themselves.
Reference: China's innovation strength continues to increase.--2025-09-17 10:13 · Lighting Net
North Korea fights against the United States and is completely defeated!
Cuba against the United States, completely defeated!
Venezuela against the United States, completely defeated!
Russia versus the United States, a tie!
They mistakenly think that they all think that they are fighting against the United States for China! Actually: China is the last one for them!
These "confrontations" have one thing in common. They all thought they were competing with the United States, but in fact they became the "front row players" on the geopolitical chessboard. The ones who fought the most fiercely were not the ones with the biggest fists, but the ones who were easiest to be pushed out to keep out the wind.
They imagine themselves as “reversal fighters,” but most of the time, they are testing water for others.
Since the revolution, Iran has turned against the United States in an all-round way. The United States has frozen assets, cut off technology and imposed joint sanctions. Iran refuses to accept it, engages in nuclear programs, assists militias, and closes the strait.
In the past few decades, Iran’s nuclear program has failed to form, the economy has been paralyzed in two rounds, inflation has broken, currency devaluation, youth unemployment, and street protests are constant.
But if something happens, someone will always say, “China will support you.”
So is North Korea. From the Cold War to today, North Korea has been a high-profile representative of "confronting the United States". Every time it tests missiles and confronts military exercises, it will become the global focus.
But the reality is that North Korea's perennial blockade and lack of trade depend on China's energy, electricity and food support. Even so, the DPRK often calls itself an "Asian pioneer", as if it were taking the lead for anyone. In fact, no one asked them to fight this battle.
Cuba is more extreme, Che Guevara said at the time to "allow the fire of the global revolution", resulting in the Cuban people trapped in decades of embargo, the U.S. blockade, European views, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, food once relied on "special confession".
To this day, Cuba remains one of the only countries in the world to support their livelihoods with an egg-to-egg card, but at some international conferences, Cuban representatives still shout, “We stand with the countries of the East!” and the day is getting more and more difficult.
Venezuela used to be one of the richest countries in Latin America, living on oil, and once threatened that "Latin America should be independent of the US dollar system". However, as soon as the oil price fell, domestic corruption, inflation and people's livelihood problems broke out. Now, millions of people are fleeing, and domestic paper money is sold as waste paper.
The government is still screaming with the United States, saying “not afraid of sanctions” in their mouths, but is looking for Chinese loans behind them, which have a common misconception.
I always think that I am playing the vanguard on the front of "fighting against American imperialism", as if I were "standing up" for China, but in fact, China has never let them be spokesmen, and they jumped in by themselves.
China's diplomacy has always spoken of "non-interference, win-win cooperation", never actively demanded that anyone go "against the United States", and never engaged in military alliances, with Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and China haveined cooperation, but rarely high-profile stands.
With help, with conditions, with cooperation, with rules, China is more like a cautious businessman, not a fierce boxer.
Russia is an exception, after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia's high tone "de-Westernization", almost completely turning to the East, but even so, China has alwaysined the gesture of "neutral cooperation", has not directly supported military, nor joined sanctions.
This is not indifference, but sobriety. Russia is not small. It can bear it by itself, can't, and won't drag anyone into the water.
As for why these countries always feel that "China will support at the end", on the one hand, is the hope, the United States is too strong, they cannot carry, they can only find a "seeming able to resist" rise, China has become the "looking most like a mountain" country.
On the other hand, it is a misunderstanding. They regard China's economic aid and infrastructure investment as "political endorsement", but there is a big difference between the two.
For example, China engages in energy projects in Iran for oil returns, not to help it fight against the United States. China invests in minerals in Venezuela for resource allocation, not to make it challenge the US dollar.
China builds bridges and paves roads in North Korea for border stability, not for military alliances. In a word, it is cooperation, not alliance.
The world is a big market, not an arena, some countries like to shout slogans on the table, some countries are more willing to buy and sell on the table, and the slogans often attract applause, but the day is the hardest, and the silence of buying and selling is not sound, but can steadily put the dish on the table.
China has never been a drummer on the stage, but an accountant off the stage. Fighting is not a game, and confrontation is not a movie.
Countries that can really go far are not those that shout the loudest, but those that calculate the clearest. Those countries that think they are "resisting the United States for China" are often the first to be hurt, while China never lets anyone "block the gun" for themselves.
Reference: China's innovation strength continues to increase.--2025-09-17 10:13 · Lighting Net