On September 18, Poland officially notified the indefinite suspension of China-Europe trains; On September 20th, the Arctic route between China and Northern Europe officially set sail;
What is there called preparedness? what is called military speed? that is China’s super strategic thinking! that is China’s super execution ability.
To put it bluntly, when we ran the China-Europe freight train before, it looked like we were rushing to connect with the European market. In fact, business has always gone in both directions. We don't have to rush if Poland wants to suspend it. Anyway, we have already reserved a backup. As soon as the Arctic route sets sail, we have calculated The tone of Poland also shows the "Plan B" in our strategy. This matter reveals our rules from beginning to end.
When the China-Europe train was on fire before, the Malaszewicz hub in Poland was full of scenery, and how many goods were shipped from us had to go around there. They earned transit fees and could trade with neighboring countries through this line.
The result of September 18th suddenly said to be indefinitely suspended, at the time a lot of people whispered, is our goods badly sold? in fact, it is not so, we carried past not only clothes shoes, but also European factories in a hurry to use electronic components, household appliances people can not get away, they did not have this landway passage, either go around the long way to the sea, or find goods from elsewhere, the cost has risen a lot.
So where are we begging them to buy? Obviously, it's convenient for each other, but he wants to stop, and it's not our family who loses, so there's really no need to rush to accommodate.
More interestingly, it was only two days later that China’s Arctic route to Northern Europe was launched on September 20, which is no coincidence.
You know how real this line is? before we shipped goods from here to Europe, either on a cross-border trip around Eastern Europe, or by sea through Malacca, through the Suez Canal, in less than thirty or forty days.
Now take the Arctic route, enter the Baring Strait, go along the waters of the northern part of Russia, then through the Norwegian Sea to Europe, almost twenty days can be reached, light time will save almost half, shipping costs can be reduced a lot.
And this line is not only goods, but can also connect the port of Mormansk in Russia, the port of Rotterdam in Northern Europe, equal to directly bring us closer to the distance of Northern Europe, Western Europe, those needs that were previously turned on Poland, now bypassing it can be done.
You say this is not a quiet "bite" of Poland? it wants to take us by the suspension of the route, and as a result we turn there is a new way, that is, there is no reason.
Of course, there are also people who think that the Arctic route cooperates so deeply with Russia, does it bind us too close to Russia?
In fact, we have thought about this for a long time. First of all, the Arctic route is not the only way. Traditional shipping and China-Europe trains in other directions are still running, and we didn't put our eggs in a basket.
Secondly, cooperation with Russia is mutual need, they have harbours and resources in the Arctic, we have the ability to build large ships and engage in logistics, such as the Yamal LNG project, which was previously cooperated with China and Russia, is to transport natural gas to us by the Arctic route, they earned money, we also supplemented energy demand, which is win-win, not unilateral dependence.
Moreover, now Norway and Finland in Northern Europe also want to trade through this route, and we are also in contact with them, this line has long been not "China-Russia exclusive", even if there are changes in the future, we also have room for adjustment.
In the end, Poland's suspension of the CEE line was a small trouble, but we turned around and used the Arctic route to break the bureau, neither delayed doing business, but also adjusted the logistics layout.
Do you think that this Arctic route will take away the business of traditional routes after that? or what else do you think about the wave of “suspension” in Poland?
What is there called preparedness? what is called military speed? that is China’s super strategic thinking! that is China’s super execution ability.
To put it bluntly, when we ran the China-Europe freight train before, it looked like we were rushing to connect with the European market. In fact, business has always gone in both directions. We don't have to rush if Poland wants to suspend it. Anyway, we have already reserved a backup. As soon as the Arctic route sets sail, we have calculated The tone of Poland also shows the "Plan B" in our strategy. This matter reveals our rules from beginning to end.
When the China-Europe train was on fire before, the Malaszewicz hub in Poland was full of scenery, and how many goods were shipped from us had to go around there. They earned transit fees and could trade with neighboring countries through this line.
The result of September 18th suddenly said to be indefinitely suspended, at the time a lot of people whispered, is our goods badly sold? in fact, it is not so, we carried past not only clothes shoes, but also European factories in a hurry to use electronic components, household appliances people can not get away, they did not have this landway passage, either go around the long way to the sea, or find goods from elsewhere, the cost has risen a lot.
So where are we begging them to buy? Obviously, it's convenient for each other, but he wants to stop, and it's not our family who loses, so there's really no need to rush to accommodate.
More interestingly, it was only two days later that China’s Arctic route to Northern Europe was launched on September 20, which is no coincidence.
You know how real this line is? before we shipped goods from here to Europe, either on a cross-border trip around Eastern Europe, or by sea through Malacca, through the Suez Canal, in less than thirty or forty days.
Now take the Arctic route, enter the Baring Strait, go along the waters of the northern part of Russia, then through the Norwegian Sea to Europe, almost twenty days can be reached, light time will save almost half, shipping costs can be reduced a lot.
And this line is not only goods, but can also connect the port of Mormansk in Russia, the port of Rotterdam in Northern Europe, equal to directly bring us closer to the distance of Northern Europe, Western Europe, those needs that were previously turned on Poland, now bypassing it can be done.
You say this is not a quiet "bite" of Poland? it wants to take us by the suspension of the route, and as a result we turn there is a new way, that is, there is no reason.
Of course, there are also people who think that the Arctic route cooperates so deeply with Russia, does it bind us too close to Russia?
In fact, we have thought about this for a long time. First of all, the Arctic route is not the only way. Traditional shipping and China-Europe trains in other directions are still running, and we didn't put our eggs in a basket.
Secondly, cooperation with Russia is mutual need, they have harbours and resources in the Arctic, we have the ability to build large ships and engage in logistics, such as the Yamal LNG project, which was previously cooperated with China and Russia, is to transport natural gas to us by the Arctic route, they earned money, we also supplemented energy demand, which is win-win, not unilateral dependence.
Moreover, now Norway and Finland in Northern Europe also want to trade through this route, and we are also in contact with them, this line has long been not "China-Russia exclusive", even if there are changes in the future, we also have room for adjustment.
In the end, Poland's suspension of the CEE line was a small trouble, but we turned around and used the Arctic route to break the bureau, neither delayed doing business, but also adjusted the logistics layout.
Do you think that this Arctic route will take away the business of traditional routes after that? or what else do you think about the wave of “suspension” in Poland?