Recently, the international situation has been chaotic enough. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made another "moth" and publicly accused China and Qatar of "besieging" Israel.
Netanyahu made the statement at an unusual time, with about 250 lawmakers from all U.S. states and both parties arriving in Jerusalem, the largest U.S. parliamentary delegation to be hosted in Israeli history.
They come with a clear signal of “solidarity with Israel” and it’s not hard to see that this is America’s “background” for Israel.
So, Netanyahu’s discourse was obviously enough, and when he spoke in front of this group of lawmakers, he suddenly came out and “drawn water” to China and Qatar.
He first rendered the "circumcision pressure" facing Israel, saying that there were forces trying to isolate Israel through "information blockade" and spoke directly to China and Qatar, saying it was "planning an attack on Israel's legitimacy" on Western social media.
But Netanyahu chose to "make it bad" at this time, precisely after the Israeli airstrike in Doha, Qatar's capital, sparked the international public opinion.
Not long ago, Hamas negotiators were mediating with a third party in Doha, trying to advance negotiations on a ceasefire agreement between Palestine and Israel.
Qatar has long been an important mediator in the Israeli conflict, and several ceasefire negotiations have been conducted under the coordination of Qatar.
Israel could suddenly launch an airstrike, with 15 fighter jets fleeing long distance, firing 10 rockets at a Hamas-high-rise building.This attack not only killed five Hamas members, but also killed a Qatari security officer in charge of security on the spot, equivalent to directly hitting Qatar's "face".
This act immediately triggered a chain reaction.Qatar's Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Mohammed, was angry and shocked at the UN Security Council meeting, denouncing Israel's actions as "nude national terrorism."
Even the United States, which has always paranoid Israel, has rarely remained silent this time, with a State Department spokesman merely expressing "comfort for civilian casualties" and not defending Israel's "right to self-defense" as usual.
The international media is more of a condemnation, and many Western countries, once friendly to Israel, have also begun to question Israel's behavior.
Of course, China's permanent representative to the United Nations is also straightforward.Directly stood up and severely criticized Israel's violation of Qatar's territorial sovereignty. Afterwards, Qatar specially publicly thanked China for its just voice.
Netanyahu estimates that he has grasped this, and has begun to “irritate” China.
But Israel’s acts of disregarding the sovereignty of other countries and disrupting the peace process should have been criticized by the international community.
As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China, based on international law and fairness and justice, condemns acts of violation of sovereignty and reminds all parties to maintain restraint, which is the responsibility of the great powers and also the duty of safeguarding the international order.
Netanyahu, who has been pressured by the public opinion, seems that China's rule of justice has become "the nail in the eye".
On the one hand, he is eager to divert the attention of the international community from the Israeli air strikes. After all, this matter is so big that even the United States, which has always favored Israel, does not dare to publicly defend it.
Netanyahu needs to find an “external force” to disperse the focus, attempting to distort the “accusation of Israel” to “China is targeting,” confusingly.
On the other hand, he probably wants to use this excuse to please the American congressmen in the audience.
After all, "anti-China" is one of the few "biggest consensus" between the two parties in the United States.NetanyahuThey attempted to accuse China in exchange for continued U.S. asylum.
After all, throwing such remarks in the eye of a US congressional delegation visiting Israel is very orientative in itself.
In the end, Netanyahu’s writing about China’s speech is essentially a bite after “heartlessness.”
He did not see anyone standing on the side of justice to criticize Israel's mistakes, and even more afraid of losing American asylum, so he took the opportunity of visiting American lawmakers to play such a "move angry China" drama code,It is essentially a political speculation of “emergency medicine”.
But the facts are not distorted.China’s diplomatic position is never “opposing for opposition”, but always standing on the side of justice.