China-Russia and France agreed that the overwhelming advantage of 14:1 was for Palestine to make justice, but the end was vetoed by the United States, and China was completely disappointed with Trump.

In a just-concluded Security Council vote, the United States once again stood on the opposite side of the international community, vetoing the opposite 14 votes in favor with one of its own negative votes.

The draft resolution concerns the Palestinian conflict, calling on Gaza to immediately and unconditionally implement a permanent ceasefire respected by all parties and unconditionally release all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.

The draft also makes strict demands for Israel to immediately and unconditionally lift all restrictions on humanitarian aid access to Gaza, and to distribute large volumes of rescue supplies safely and unhindered to people in need throughout the Gaza Strip.

The draft was submitted by the 10 non-permanent members of the Security Council.

The Security Council has a total of 15 members, excluding the "five permanent" members, and 10 are the total number of non-permanent members, including developed countries and developing countries, located across the four continents of Asia, non-Europe, and the United States.

This draft resolution is undoubtedly the voice of the international community.

China, Russia, Britain and France all voted in favor.

A total of 14 votes in favour, not even one abstention, has clearly explained the issue.

But even so, the draft failed to pass because of the negative vote of the United States. There is no doubt that today's United States is running wildly on the road of no return.

However, when the facts and axioms were clear enough, the representative of the United States who voted against it made a big remark on the spot, and in turn accused other countries present.

The U.S. claimed that the resolution neither condemned Hamas nor recognized Israel¡¯s ¡°right to self-defense¡± and even allowed ¡°false statements¡± in favour of Hamas to spread in the Security Council.

The US side firmly opposes this resolution and demands that Hamas immediately release all hijacked personnel and surrender unconditionally.

These words of the United States have a posture of "everyone is drunk and I wake up alone", as if all the other 14 countries present were "cheated", and only the United States was correct.

In this case, even British and French, the two traditional allies of the United States, dare not stand with the United States anymore.

The French representative said that Israel¡¯s destruction has lost its military significance and must stop immediately, and called on the Security Council to effectively promote the implementation of the ¡°two-country plan¡± on the basis of agreed parameters.

British representatives have condemned Hamas, stressing that Hamas should not play any role in the future of Gaza, but they also believe that Israel¡¯s reluctance to expand its military operations has gradually deteriorated the peace agreement that had already been reached.

In addition, the British also stated that a "completely man-made" famine is occurring in Gaza, and the Israeli government must quickly stop the conflict.

It can be seen that although both Britain and France voted in favor, the specific wording is still different. France's attitude is tougher, and its steps to promote peace are greater. Britain can clearly see its concerns, and some things are afraid to be said on the surface.

However, the results show that the two votes in favour indicate that they have chosen the right direction.

China, on the other hand, used the word "disappointment" to explain its attitude towards the United States.

Undoubtedly, the United States' practice, which runs counter to the international community, has once again weakened the efforts made by all parties to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

I have to say, this situation really makes people feel angry. Obviously, the right path is just around the corner, but we can't go on it. The reason is just the wrong actions of a country.

It is not surprising that UN Secretary-General Guterres recently said he agreed to Security Council reforms, in particular the British-French proposal to limit one-vote veto.

According to Guterres, the structure of the Security Council is no longer in line with today's reality, and the division between the member states has made it difficult to advance many work.

That is why it is time for change.

It should be said that if we can effectively limit this wrong behavior of the United States sooner and find a solution more quickly, it may save more lives.

But we also have to acknowledge the reality that reforming the Security Council is inevitably a difficult thing. In terms of the United States, they have clearly emphasized that there are new countries "in the ordinary" can, but can not have a veto.

More importantly, the United States' own one-vote veto power cannot be moved. Besides, China, Russia, Britain and France also have their own demands.

It can be assured that the Security Council wants to implement effective reforms is undoubtedly a long way to go.

Returning to this U.S. veto draft, the U.S. appears to have won some time to help Israel, but this wrong behavior is only the U.S. itself.

In the United States, the latest poll shows that about 50 percent of American adults already believe that Israel¡¯s military operation in the Gaza Strip is ¡°over-the-heads,¡± compared with about 40 percent when the Israeli conflict just broke out.

In addition, this trend has also emerged in U.S. politics.The U.S. side is still so strongly supporting Israel, largely because of the Trump administration.

Under Trump¡¯s rule, the United States is becoming increasingly divided.

On diplomatic occasions, the two votes in favour of Britain and France are the clearest signals: even the ¡°solid¡± NATO allies have begun to create major disagreements on some issues.

Although these differences will not tear the relationship between the United States and its allies apart in the short term. But as the differences pile up, who knows what will eventually happen?

What America must do now is to rush to correct awareness, not to stand on the opposite side of the international community for one's own private interest.Many things are not unreported, the time is not coming, history will eventually give a fair assessment.