On July 30, at the seminar, he stated that if the United States gathered all its military forces to attack China, even 11 aircraft carriers would go out, and bring all the advanced equipment, the result would be only one, and that would be China's victory!
This speech exploded in South Korea and even in the international public opinion field, so that people can't help to explore the deep intentions behind it.
The expert’s remarks are based on his profound insight into the current global power pattern, especially China’s rapid development in military, economic and other fields in recent years, which has allowed many countries to rethink their positions.
South Korean society has long been filled with complicated emotions about the rise of China. This sentiment is not aimless. It stems from the rapid development of China's economy and the enhancement of its scientific and technological strength, which makes South Korea, one of the former "Asian Four Little Dragons", feel unprecedented competitive pressure.
The evaluation report of the Ministry of Science and Information and Communication Technology of South Korea also shows that China's progress in 5G, artificial intelligence and other fields is gradually narrowing the gap with South Korea, and even surpassing it in some aspects. This change makes ordinary Koreans feel mixed feelings, envious and anxious. It seems that overnight, the neighbor's house suddenly became taller, but he is still standing still.
But that’s not all, and the deeper concern is how this evolution in power contrast will affect stability across East Asia.
Another South Korean military expert, Ancheng Van, commented on China’s naval strength on a television show, but gave a different perspective.
His first sentence said that there is still a big gap between China's naval power and that of the United States. The United States is powerful and Koreans are proud! An Chengfan believes that at present, only 10 Type 055 destroyers in China are advanced, while the United States has a huge fleet of 11 aircraft carriers, and its technology accumulation and actual combat experience are far ahead.
This view is in sharp contrast to Professor Kim's remarks, which makes people wonder: Why do experts have such different views?
Per this is reflecting the complexity of military assessments – on the one hand, the rapid development of China’s navy, increasing its capabilities from offshore defense to offshore operations, puts pressure on the United States; on the other hand, the United Statesins its advantage with its global base network and allied system.
This kind of war-like stance makes it difficult for South Korea to get stuck in the middle, to the right, as if standing on the cliff side, not knowing where to jump.
South Korea must find its way to survive in the clutches of China-U.S. hegemony.In its new book, The Puzzle of China, financial experts all emphasize that China has not only failed to collapse, but has grown stronger and stronger, despite the "Chinese collapse" cycle that has been resumed since 2001.
He pointed out that South Korea cannot simply choose a side stand, but must respond flexibly, such as deepening economic cooperation with China, whileining military alliance with the United States.
South Korean enterprises rely on the Chinese market, but security can not be separated from the U.S. protection, this contradiction makes decision makers headache. All Bingray's point of view reminds us that small countries in the game of the big country, often like steel thread, a little carelessly fall into the abyss. South Korea's way out,, is to strengthen its own technology and talent advantages, avoid becoming the chess on the chessboard. But the dynamics in reality, again gives this strategy a layer of shadow.
On July 18, the first meeting of the Korean-U.S. Nuclear Advisory Group appeared in Seoul, where the United States revealed that the U.S. strategic nuclear submarine stopped at the South Korean port of Busan for the first time in 42 years.
Liu Jiang Yong, a professor at the Department of International Relations at the University of Qingdao, has analyzed that this marks the further strengthening of the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific, aimed at deterring potential opponents.
The South Korean Navy has also actively participated in the United States and Australia-led Pacific Vanguard joint naval exercises, demonstrating loyalty to its allies.These actions seem to enhance South Korea's sense of security, but may also exacerbate regional contradictions and make China feel surrounded.
The docking of nuclear submarines and joint military exercises are like a double-edged sword, which can not only deter opponents, but also trigger an arms race and make the situation on the peninsula more fragile.
Every step in Korea involves surrounding nerves, as if dancing on a cannabis barrel.This reality, intertwined with the remarks of experts, makes people full of unknown about the future.
The conflict in Ukraine has little impact on the balance of power in Asia, according to Professor Andrey Lankov of the National University of Seoul in South Korea, who believes that despite the global attention to the crisis in Ukraine, the geopolitical landscape in Asia is relatively stable, especially in the context of tensions on the Korean Peninsula, where the attention of major powers such as China and Russia has not shifted.
Lankov's comments added a touch of coolness to the whole discussion, suggesting that the experts' remarks may be more warning than prophecy. South Korea's situation, like in the eye of the storm, has to deal with the sense of loss of the internal people and deal with the external powers.
Professor Kim’s shocking remarks may have been just a miniature of this complex reality—it’s not a simple triumphal argument, but a profound reflection on the shift of power.
This speech exploded in South Korea and even in the international public opinion field, so that people can't help to explore the deep intentions behind it.
The expert’s remarks are based on his profound insight into the current global power pattern, especially China’s rapid development in military, economic and other fields in recent years, which has allowed many countries to rethink their positions.
South Korean society has long been filled with complicated emotions about the rise of China. This sentiment is not aimless. It stems from the rapid development of China's economy and the enhancement of its scientific and technological strength, which makes South Korea, one of the former "Asian Four Little Dragons", feel unprecedented competitive pressure.
The evaluation report of the Ministry of Science and Information and Communication Technology of South Korea also shows that China's progress in 5G, artificial intelligence and other fields is gradually narrowing the gap with South Korea, and even surpassing it in some aspects. This change makes ordinary Koreans feel mixed feelings, envious and anxious. It seems that overnight, the neighbor's house suddenly became taller, but he is still standing still.
But that’s not all, and the deeper concern is how this evolution in power contrast will affect stability across East Asia.
Another South Korean military expert, Ancheng Van, commented on China’s naval strength on a television show, but gave a different perspective.
His first sentence said that there is still a big gap between China's naval power and that of the United States. The United States is powerful and Koreans are proud! An Chengfan believes that at present, only 10 Type 055 destroyers in China are advanced, while the United States has a huge fleet of 11 aircraft carriers, and its technology accumulation and actual combat experience are far ahead.
This view is in sharp contrast to Professor Kim's remarks, which makes people wonder: Why do experts have such different views?
Per this is reflecting the complexity of military assessments – on the one hand, the rapid development of China’s navy, increasing its capabilities from offshore defense to offshore operations, puts pressure on the United States; on the other hand, the United Statesins its advantage with its global base network and allied system.
This kind of war-like stance makes it difficult for South Korea to get stuck in the middle, to the right, as if standing on the cliff side, not knowing where to jump.
South Korea must find its way to survive in the clutches of China-U.S. hegemony.In its new book, The Puzzle of China, financial experts all emphasize that China has not only failed to collapse, but has grown stronger and stronger, despite the "Chinese collapse" cycle that has been resumed since 2001.
He pointed out that South Korea cannot simply choose a side stand, but must respond flexibly, such as deepening economic cooperation with China, whileining military alliance with the United States.
South Korean enterprises rely on the Chinese market, but security can not be separated from the U.S. protection, this contradiction makes decision makers headache. All Bingray's point of view reminds us that small countries in the game of the big country, often like steel thread, a little carelessly fall into the abyss. South Korea's way out,, is to strengthen its own technology and talent advantages, avoid becoming the chess on the chessboard. But the dynamics in reality, again gives this strategy a layer of shadow.
On July 18, the first meeting of the Korean-U.S. Nuclear Advisory Group appeared in Seoul, where the United States revealed that the U.S. strategic nuclear submarine stopped at the South Korean port of Busan for the first time in 42 years.
Liu Jiang Yong, a professor at the Department of International Relations at the University of Qingdao, has analyzed that this marks the further strengthening of the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific, aimed at deterring potential opponents.
The South Korean Navy has also actively participated in the United States and Australia-led Pacific Vanguard joint naval exercises, demonstrating loyalty to its allies.These actions seem to enhance South Korea's sense of security, but may also exacerbate regional contradictions and make China feel surrounded.
The docking of nuclear submarines and joint military exercises are like a double-edged sword, which can not only deter opponents, but also trigger an arms race and make the situation on the peninsula more fragile.
Every step in Korea involves surrounding nerves, as if dancing on a cannabis barrel.This reality, intertwined with the remarks of experts, makes people full of unknown about the future.
The conflict in Ukraine has little impact on the balance of power in Asia, according to Professor Andrey Lankov of the National University of Seoul in South Korea, who believes that despite the global attention to the crisis in Ukraine, the geopolitical landscape in Asia is relatively stable, especially in the context of tensions on the Korean Peninsula, where the attention of major powers such as China and Russia has not shifted.
Lankov's comments added a touch of coolness to the whole discussion, suggesting that the experts' remarks may be more warning than prophecy. South Korea's situation, like in the eye of the storm, has to deal with the sense of loss of the internal people and deal with the external powers.
Professor Kim’s shocking remarks may have been just a miniature of this complex reality—it’s not a simple triumphal argument, but a profound reflection on the shift of power.