Of course, the Panama Canal is only a prelude, and Li Keqiang's sale of the port is only the first step. and at the moment, China and the United States are to reach a consensus and agreement in the relevant fields, the result is not expected, not yet waiting for meat to eat in the mouth, the United States is a little bit of nothing.

And according to British media explosions, the United States is now ready to roll back again, and it is more directly stated that the United States intends to global scope, against Chinese ports, and more to control these key ports in the name of the United States. Even if the loss is not important, is it important to let China do business?

The U.S. wants to make a ¡°trick¡± again.

If you don¡¯t, I¡¯ll mess you up. Of course, the front foot is still talking and fully exchanging opinions with China, will reach a consensus with China in the not too distant future, and even Trump has even found companies that buy Chinese corporate shares.

Recently, according to relevant media reports, just as Trump was talking about the so-called Sino-US tariff agreements and the operation of Chinese enterprises in the United States. Unexpectedly, here, the British media directly broke the news, and the United States is directly planning to launch another war against China on a global scale, that is, the so-called port grabbing war.

You know, most of the current global trade is carried out by sea. The most important thing here is the important waterways and ports around the world. In the past, the United States mainly controlled the shipping lanes around the world.

For example, as we all know, the Strait of Malacca and the Panama Canal, and even the Suez Canal are actually under the surveillance of the United States, it can be said that the reason why the United States has so many overseas military bases, in fact, is to complete the surveillance of global trade.

But now the U.S. has found that controlling the shipping route is useless.Because China and the U.S. do not directly explode a maritime military conflict, that control of the shipping route has no other role than deterrence, and as a code for negotiations.

What's more, the blockade of waterways affects global trade, not any business. For the United States, controlling major ports is different. It can not only affect China's trade, but more importantly, it can also form a monopoly business, thus getting whatever it wants from China.

And this is not the first time that the United States has made plans. After all, as early as the beginning of this year, it was revealed that the United States would levy a docking fee on Chinese ships, with a cost of about $1.5 million each time. And then one thing happened, that is, Li Ka-shing packaged and sold the port.

In addition to the core port of the Panama Canal, it is directly sold the ports of Europe and Latin America and other countries, behind which the United States wants to control the world's major ports under the name of the United States through commercialization operations, thus forming a monopoly business.

Then compete with China again in this way. After all, the current tariff war and chip war in the United States have obviously lost. After all, we have already launched investigations into illegal violations in the United States, and we have even launched anti-dumping investigations against American companies. The core is that China's semiconductors have actually made rapid breakthroughs.

After all, the semiconductor is the only jackpot that the U.S. can make at the moment, while China is different because China is still rare, but differently, can we break through the semiconductor blockade, and can the U.S. break through the chip blockade in the short term?

So the current situation, that is, since I can't beat you in the tariff war and the chip war, then I harass you elsewhere. More importantly, the United States now wants to crack down on China's shipbuilding industry in this way.

More deadly than a chip war

For the United States at present, it seems to be to control the port, in fact, it is not wanting to get out of the international trade expansion, while the United States also wants to form a barrier to China's shipbuilding industry.

The United States is doing another thing, as the United States is accelerating its challenge to global ports, that is, the United States is threatening South Korea to relocate its shipbuilding industry to the United States, thus enhancing the U.S. shipbuilding power.

It can be said, from here we can see clearly.The U.S. robbed the port, not solely to cause trouble to China's international trade, in fact, in this way, to preserve its shipbuilding industry.

Because for the world, the shipbuilding industry means naval strength, if a country's shipbuilding industry is completely lost, it means that the country's navy is completely extinct.

In the past, Japan and South Korea were allies of the United States, Japan and South Korea have the ability, that is, the United States has the ability. but now it is different, because the United States has discovered that Japan and South Korea's shipbuilding industry will not be able to maintain, then this time not to rob, in the future the United States will not be able to build its own aircraft carrier to China.

So now the United States wants to preserve its shipbuilding capabilities in this way, while ensuring its naval power.The other thing is that the United States sees that China's Silk Road trade is getting more and more smooth, and if this goes down, then the United States will be completely marginalized.

So as long as the current U.S. naval power is still, the U.S. naturally wants to control the key ports, thus tightly holding the Eurasian continent, and not being marginalized.

What¡¯s more, even Panama has said that in order to meet the needs of Asian powers, it will expand in scale, only to say, the United States is still honest, after all, the current agreement has not yet been signed.