Israel’s “crying out” in the face of the whole world, while demonstrating its ubiquitous penetration capabilities, this “both needed” practice exposes Netanyahu’s true intentions.
After launching tanks into Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu suddenly spoke in public, repeatedly stressing that Israel was “isolated.” To prove this conclusion, Netanyahu even proactively “touched” China, saying that the “opinion offensive” launched by China and Qatar was “belonging” to Israel in order to invest huge amounts of money in the confrontation. It appears to be highlighting Israel’s “contribution” to the world, and it actually shows the threat of Israel.。
“Isolation” is the slogan, transferring contradictions is the truth.
This is said because in the previous operation against Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israel simultaneously detonated a large number of BP machines, causing a large number of casualties, the results of subsequent investigations showed that Israel has installed micro-explosives in these devices, and now Israel has said that it is deeply involved in the manufacture of mobile phones, generating bad connections.
In fact, Israel, which claims to be “isolated,” has also recently released a news that in its previous conflict with Iran, the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad has established a “small army” of 100 agents in Iran that smuggled Iranian missile systems to destroy numerous Iranian missile launchers and air defense systems.
Whether it is to install explosives in communications equipment, or send a large number of agents to infiltrate destruction, Israel exposes this “unprecedented and unfavourable” bottom line, which is nothing more than a threat to other countries: don’t “do it against” Israel.。
The reason for Israel to demonstrate its threatening capabilities in a situation of “isolation” is because in a long conflict, Israel finally feels in danger.
Israel is currently facing multiple structural pressures: the prolonged military operations in Gaza have led to domestic divisions, the economic sector has been undermined by international supply chain volatility and rising agricultural prices, and the diplomatic level is facing arms embargo from major European countries and collective condemnation from the global South.
These pressures should have been addressed by adjusting policies and seeking diplomatic breakthroughs. For Netanyahu, acknowledging a fault is equivalent to “political suicide.”。
He chose to externalize the contradictions into the narrative of the "international community siege Israel", by shaping the image of the "external enemy", on the one hand, to turn the attention of immigrants to the wrong government decision-making, on the other hand, with the "crisis mobilization" to consolidate the support of the right-wing basic disc.
It is cautious that he pointed his head to China and Qatar, which are not coincidental: China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, has always held an objective and fair stance to push for a ceasefire; and Qatar has played a key role in humanitarian aid and negotiations in Gaza.
It appears, Netanyahu has openly blamed, in fact, looking for excuses for his refusal to peace talks.covering up Israeli unilateral acts of violence on the Palestinian issue.
The more isolated the threat, the deeper Israel is.
Looking back at Israel’s recent series of military moves – whether it’s cross-border attacks on critical Iranian facilities or unreasonable attacks on Middle Eastern countries like Qatar – is essentiallyining deterrent advantage by showing force.
But This logic of "control by violence" has produced the opposite effect in the complex geological environment of the Middle East.It not only failed to deter the opponent, but instead became a catalyst for aggravating contradictions.
At the military level, the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad has demonstrated strong penetration and destructive capabilities, but its extreme means of targeting civilian communications equipment have broken the ethical bottom line of modern warfare.
Such actions have not only caused numerous innocent civilian casualties, but also raised deep doubts around the world about the safety of Israeli technology products.
As ordinary consumers begin to worry that mobile phones and communications devices may hide deadly risks, Israel’s trust in the global technology industry chain has loosened.
In foreign affairs, Israel’s aggressive behavior against mediators such as Qatar directly undermines the bond of trust in regional peace efforts.
Egypt’s recent leadership in the formation of the “Arab version of NATO” marks the Arab countries’ beginning to build an independent security framework, which reflects the Middle East’s collective alertness to Israeli military adventure.
It is not excluded that Israel would interpret this as a "hostile siege" and then intensify retaliatory measures, this vicious cycle that has escalated tensions that could previously be eased by diplomatic means, eventually forming the deadline of "action-revenge-reaction".
Despite the U.S. continuing to provide core military support to Israel, many European countries have begun to impose arms embargoes, some even put pressure directly by resisting Israeli goods and restricting investment.
Ask to A military, diplomatic, and economic blocked Israel, what capital is there to stand in the opposite face of the whole world?？
America’s umbrella can’t be saved today.
Looking at the world, Israel will find that its “friend” is only the United States.This is its greatest “protective umbrella” and the root of its danger.
Netanyahu’s administration’s daring to continue its radical policies depends heavily on unconditional U.S. support.
However, this dependency is facing unprecedented challenges, with the decline in U.S. global influence being undeniable from an international perspective, and its strategic contraction trend in the Middle East being increasingly evident.
Even if the current U.S. government continues to provide military aid to Israel on the basis of its alliance obligations, this support will not last indefinitely – domestic political games, fiscal pressures, and a shift in global strategic focus will limit U.S. investments in Israel.
More importantly, Israel’s current policy direction is in fundamental conflict with the long-term interests of the United States, and while the United States supports Israel’s security needs, it also needs to maintain overall stability in the Middle East to safeguard “America’s priority.”
Israel’s strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities and undifferentiated attacks on Arab nations will not only exacerbate regional unrest, but more likely will drag the U.S. government into a wider conflict whirlwind when more and more Americans start to question “why to pay for Israel’s risky acts.”
Historical experience has shown countless times that any advantage that relies on the maintenance of violence is vulnerable. Israel replaces diplomatic negotiations by military deterrence, translates internal contradictions by creating crises, and escapes responsibility through anonymous mediatorsBeing “isolated” is of course an unexpected end.