Late at night on September 9, the night sky in Doha was suddenly torn apart, 15 Israeli fighter jets crashed like hungry wolves, 10 missiles hit the ground in seconds, and explosions shook the entire diplomatic district.

Even more shockingly, the explosion was only 800 meters from the Chinese embassy, the embassy glass was crushed by the shock wave, and staff with documents drove to the underground security zone.

This is not an ordinary air strike. Next to the target are embassies of more than a dozen countries. Before the air strike, Hamas was still talking about a ceasefire!

Why does Israel dare to attack the diplomatic zone? Is this 800 meters deliberately stepping on the bottom line of China and international law?

Israeli airstrikes into Doha diplomatic area

At midnight on September 9, a few people were on the streets of Doha, and staff at the Chinese embassy was preparing documents.

Suddenly, a whispering sound came out of the window, followed by an explosion.

Fifteen Israeli fighter jets had long since touched into the airspace, 10 missiles were brushed down, and the code of action was called "The Peak of the Flame", according to Netanyahu in the command center staring at the screen all the way.

The earthquake of the explosion spread along the ground to the embassy, and the glass of the office was completely shattered. The debris splashed under the flagpole, and the building shook unsteadily.

The staff reacted very quickly, withdrew to the underground safety zone according to the emergency process, and immediately the embassy sent a warning: Chinese people in Doha should not approach the scene.

What is even more impressive is the speciality of this place.

The building is located next to Vadiladan Street, within a kilometer of which dozens of embassies and international schools are crowded, a central diplomatic district.

Moreover, 24 hours before the air strike, the Qatari Foreign Minister had just reached a preliminary consensus with the Hamas Chairman. The Hamas delegation was in the room talking about the "three-phase ceasefire plan" of the United States. When the lights were still on, the bomb came.

But the most worrying thing about this air raid is not only that the embassy glass was shattered, but also that the timing and location it chose directly poked the weakness of peace in the Middle East.

Even where negotiations dare explode, what does Israel want to do?

China's tough response

Two days later, at the emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, the atmosphere was so tense that it could break the strings.

As soon as Fu Cong, China's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, spoke, he didn't use his usual polite words, and his tone was as hard as throwing a stone: "Israel is a flagrant violation of Qatar's sovereignty, a flagrant violation of international law and a flagrant violation of peace!"

Those three ¡°honestly¡± are not anything to say.

The first "blatant" refers to sovereignty. Qatar is a serious sovereign country, and Israel throws bombs across the border without saying hello. No matter who the target is, this is open robbery in international law.

The second "blatant" is to step on the rules. The Charter of the United Nations clearly states that all countries are sovereign equality, but Israel treats the rules as waste paper.

The third most harsh, directly pointed out that Israel was deliberately destroying peace.At the time of the airstrikes, Hamas was still talking about ceasefire, and the missile bombings were not just houses, but the hope for peace.

Fujimori specifically emphasized the detail of ¡°Hamas is talking about a ceasefire¡± as a blow to the bottom of Israel: don¡¯t you mean fighting extremists?

It's not without reason why China is so tough.

The diplomatic zone is not a battlefield, the embassy security is the bottom line. Can Israel dare to do so, is it really just a momentary impulse?

Back 26 years ago, it was discovered that behind the 800 meters, there was a more familiar hegemonic logic.

Hegemony logic continues from 180 meters to 800 meters

In 1999, at the time of the Kosovo war, the US-led NATO exaggerated, throwing five missiles with B-2 bombers, directly hitting the Chinese embassy in the South.

At the time, NATO found an absurd reason: "Using outdated maps, positioning 180 meters", and described the aggression as "a mistake."

Twenty-six years have passed and Israel¡¯s missiles have become more accurate, and excuses have changed.

After Netanyahu bombed, he directly said "I make decisions and I am responsible" instead of pretending to be a "mistake".

But the essence remains unchanged: all hegemonic countries ignore diplomatic rules, take the security of the Chinese embassy as an air. 180 meters to 800 meters, far away, but that kind of contempt for international law, not a little.

When the embassy in Yugoslavia was bombed, it became a pain in the hearts of the Chinese people; Now that the glass of the embassy in Doha is broken, I remind everyone again: Diplomatic institutions are not soft tomatoes, the routes of hegemony change again, nor can they conceal the nature of violation of the law.

If you understand the history and look at Israel's action this time, you will know that the calculation behind it is actually not complicated at all, and it is all about domestic political accounts.

Reasons for Israeli Action

Netanyahu is having a hard time now. The corruption case is about to be finalized, and the government budget is stuck. Gaza has been fighting a war of attrition for eight months. The domestic people are complaining and street protests continue.

At this time, the easiest diversion is to be tough with the outside world.

Unfortunately, the airstrikes did not end, as Israeli media.

The right-wing support rate rose by 12 percentage points, and the no-confidence vote in parliament was postponed. To put it bluntly, this is to bet peace in the Middle East for one's own political life.

But paper can¡¯t burn the fire, and the claims of the United States and Qatar are directly involved.

The U.S. said it was "notifying Qatar 45 minutes in advance" and the Qatar prime minister was straight back: "We received a phone call only 10 minutes after the explosion," who was lying at a glance.

More importantly, the 15 members of the UN Security Council, even the United States, voted for condemnation, and the whole world didn't like this unilateral violence.

Israel wanted to rely on air strikes to divert conflicts, but as a result, it pushed itself into an isolated situation.

The Israeli calculator, in the end, has not escaped the eyes of the international community, nor can it stop China's realistic proposals for peace in the Middle East.

The confidence of China's plan and the path of peace in the Middle East

In the face of the Middle East, China has not only said nothing, but has come up with a real solution ¨C the ¡°two-country solution.¡±

Let Palestine establish a state on the 1967 border, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and live in peace with Israel.

This is not a fantasy, but a solid support.

China has also sent more than 2,000 tons of humanitarian supplies to Gaza, all of which are food and medicines.

In the United Nations, ceasefire resolutions have been promoted again and again to help Palestine and Israel find opportunities for dialogue.

Now that Saudi Arabia, the UAE and these Arab countries are standing up to support China¡¯s proposal, UN Secretary-General Guterres has also publicly said that ¡°China¡¯s initiative can break the cycle of violence.¡±

On the other hand, Israel's military methods are completely becoming more and more chaotic.

Gaza killed 64,000 civilians in 11 months, most of whom were women and children, while support for Hamas has increased.

Israel itself is not better, with military spending accounting for more than 5% of GDP, more than twice as high as ordinary peaceful countries, and people's livelihoods are getting worse and worse.

The fact is that bombs cannot solve problems, only peaceful dialogue is useful.

Now the question is, is Israel's seemingly "precise" air strike a warning or a provocation? How should the world choose?

conclusion

No matter how accurate Israel's missiles are, they cannot hide the rudeness of hegemonic logic. Technological progress is not a reason to trample on international law, and diplomatic zones are not battlefields for casual bombings.

800 meters is not only a distance, but also a test of China's bottom line and the international rule of law.

China, with three ¡°open¡± attitudes and a ¡°two-country¡± approach, is trying to tell the world that the Middle East does not need more bombs, it needs peace.

Only by keeping the bottom line of international law and respecting the sovereignty of all countries can the Middle East truly get out of war, which is also the bottom line that everyone should adhere to.