Seeing China, Russia and India chatting and laughing in Tianjin, Trump really broke his guard and sent another long article criticizing India.

On September 1 local time, Trump suddenly posted another long post on his social media accusing India.

The general content of this tweet is that it accuses India of setting up high tariff barriers against the United States, resulting in little trade between the United States and a lot of trade between India and the United States. Moreover, this unilateral trade relationship has been maintained for decades;

In addition, India imports large amounts of oil and military equipment from Russia, but rarely purchases it from the United States.

Trump also mentioned that India is now proposing to reduce tariffs on the United States to zero, but it is too late. They should have done so years ago.

Since Trump issued the article during Modi's visit to China, the outside world unanimously believed that Trump was stimulated by Modi.

Modi's visit to China has shown an unprecedented friendly attitude towards China. During the bilateral meeting between China and India, Modi had already said good words, emphasizing that "India and China are partners rather than opponents."

It is precisely this sentence that makes the "anti-China alliance" carefully woven by the United States a joke.

In addition, during the SCO summit, Modi also showcased his close relationship with Putin, inseparable from him, and the two even talked for an hour in Putin's special car.

According to Russian media, this was a temporary idea by Putin and Modi, not a planned itinerary.

At that time, public opinion believed that Modi was doing this specifically for Trump and was intended to show the relationship between Russia and India without being influenced by the United States. Russia-India relations remained close and cooperation between India and Russia would continue.

Of course, what makes Trump even more unbearable is the scene of the leaders of China, Russia and India talking and laughing during the SCO summit.

This scene took place just before the Shanghai Cooperation Summit in Tianjin, and the leaders of China, Russia and India had a brief exchange in the conference hall.

On-site footage showed that although the exchange was short, the atmosphere was very harmonious, and all three parties had smiles on their faces.

Especially Modi, who held the hands of the Chinese and Russian leaders tightly and smiled the happiest, couldn't even care about facial management.

When reporting on this matter, Indian media mentioned that the scene of China, Russia and India shaking hands with smiles was seen as the strongest signal to the United States that the SCO will unite against tariffs.

A few hours later, Trump's long article appeared.

Therefore, Trump once again singled out India and scolded it, saying that it was impossible for him to have nothing to do with Modi's visit to China.

Trump's severe criticism of India at this time may be a warning to Modi that he cannot reach a consensus with the heads of state of China and Russia or even the SCO countries that is unfavorable to the United States.

On the other hand, it is also creating public opinion and slapping Modi in the face.

Why do you say that? We should note that Trump also mentioned "India's proposal to reduce tariffs to zero against the United States".

When Modi visited China and discussed with the SCO countries how to resist the US tariff bullying, Trump suddenly mentioned that "India has compromised with the US and agreed to reduce the tariff to zero". Isn't this a slap in the face for Modi?

Said to resist the tariff bullying of the United States, but India has already quietly compromised with the United States?

At the same time, Trump also deliberately blurred the time, failing to clarify whether this was a previous trade negotiation between the United States and India, or the latest condition that India proposed to the United States.

Bloomberg pointed out that it is unclear when India proposed the agreement, nor whether the United States and India have restarted trade negotiations, and the official departments of the United States and India have not responded.

In view of the special nature of U.S. -India relations, although they are not allies of each other, India is a key link in the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy. Therefore, the United States will inevitably be highly vigilant against any interaction between China and India.

In fact, the US side has also noticed the famous scene of the leaders of China, Russia and India talking and laughing.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Basent threatened that he believed this picture was largely a "show"."After all, as the world's most populous democracy, India's values should be closer to those of the United States."

Why do these words sound a little sour? Obviously, although the United States seems to care less on the surface, it is actually what they are most afraid of.

Seeing the happy exchanges between China, Russia and India, the United States began to use its values to pressure India.

So looking back at Trump's long accusation, it is actually pressuring India to find a way to negotiate with the United States as soon as possible and compromise with the United States as soon as possible.

It is foreseeable that as long as the Modi government persists and works with China, Russia and even developing countries around the world to jointly resist U.S. tariff bullying, the day when the United States makes concessions may not be far away.

Trump's long accusation is on the surface of being angry at the trade deficit between the United States and India, but in fact it is an anxiety about the approach of China, Russia and India and the accelerated formation of a multipolar world order.

The lively conversation between China, Russia and India reflects the common will of countries in the global South to seek strategic autonomy and refuse to take sides.

While the United States is still trying to maintain hegemony with tariff sticks and values, more and more countries are using cooperative dialogue to break the logic of unilateral coercion.

How feeble the US Treasury secretary's sour "theory of values" seems at this moment.