On this day, 28 years ago, April 14, 1997 (March 8, 1997, the United Nations vetoed the anti-China human rights bill for the seventh time. The 53rd United Nations Human Rights Conference on April 15, 1997, the United Nations vetoed the anti-China human rights proposal for the seventh time. Under the manipulation and support of the United States, some Western countries have proposed anti-China motions seven times at the United Nations Human Rights Conference since 1990 in the name of "caring about the human rights situation in China." China has united with developing countries and jointly defeated Western countries 'attempts to adopt double standards on human rights issues and use human rights issues to interfere in China's internal affairs: the first time: March 6, 1990, the 46th United Nations Conference on Human Rights. Eighteen Western countries including Belgium, Denmark, and the United States jointly proposed the so-called "Human Rights Situation in China" bill condemning the human rights situation in China and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. The representative of Pakistan proposed not to review the bill. When the 43 member states voted, Pakistan's motion was passed with 17 votes in favor, 15 votes against, and 11 abstentions. In March 1991, the 46th United Nations Conference on Human Rights. The countries were divided and no anti-China motion was proposed. Second time: March 4, 1992, at 8 p.m., the 48th United Nations Conference on Human Rights. With the support of the United States, 24 countries including Australia and Denmark proposed a motion on the "China/Xizang Situation" to interfere in China's internal affairs and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. The representative of Pakistan immediately moved a motion requesting that the bill not be reviewed. The vote of 53 member states passed the Pakistani representative's motion with 27 votes in favor, 15 votes against, 10 abstentions, and one country absent. Third time: March 10, 1993, the 49th United Nations Conference on Human Rights. 22 countries including Denmark, the United States, and Japan proposed a motion condemning the "human rights situation in China" and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. Jin Yongjian, head of the China delegation, immediately moved a motion requesting the meeting not to review the proposal. As a result, the motion was passed with 22 votes in favor, 17 votes against, and 12 abstentions. Fourth: March 9, 1994, the 50th United Nations Conference on Human Rights. Germany, Denmark, and the United States proposed an anti-China motion on "Human Rights Situation in China" and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. Jin Yongjian, head of the China delegation, immediately moved a motion requesting the meeting not to review the motion. As a result, Jin Yongjian's motion was passed with 20 votes in favor, 16 votes against, and 17 abstentions. Fifth: March 8, 1995, the 51st United Nations Conference on Human Rights. The United States, Canada, Denmark, and Japan once again proposed a motion condemning China's "human rights situation in China" and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. The result was rejected with 21 votes against, 20 votes in favor, and 12 abstentions. Sixth session: April 23, 1996, the 52nd United Nations Conference on Human Rights. 26 countries including the Netherlands, Denmark, and the United Kingdom once again proposed an anti-China motion on "Human Rights Situation in China" and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. Wu Jianmin, head of the China delegation, immediately moved a motion requesting the meeting not to review the proposal. As a result, Wu Jianmin's motion was passed with 27 votes in favor, 20 votes against, and 6 abstentions. Seventh session: April 15, 1997, the 53rd United Nations Conference on Human Rights. While France, Germany, Italy, Spain and other countries did not participate in the anti-China joint motion, Denmark, the United States and other countries continued to propose a motion condemning China's "human rights situation in China" and submitted it to the meeting for a vote. Wu Jianmin, head of the China delegation, immediately moved a motion requesting the meeting not to review the proposal. As a result, Wu Jianmin's motion was passed with 27 votes in favor, 17 votes against, and 9 abstentions.