If the United States is really going to fight, it is estimated that it can pull Japan, South Korea, NATO and the European Union, and China can expect only one.
Although the list of U.S. allies is long, when it comes to getting serious, there is a question mark whether these relationships are reliable or not. Fighting is not about shouting slogans. Geographical location, resources, and production capabilities cannot be clear.
Let's start with NATO, which the United States hopes most. They have an Article 5 clause, which says that if one ally is attacked, even if everyone is attacked, it sounds quite scary. But there are many tricks involved here. The terms clearly state that they only protect Europe and North America. According to the rules, they are not obligated to get involved in our affairs in Asia.
Besides, those European countries are now doing business with China, with hundreds of billions of dollars of sales every year, German cars and French cosmetics, and how many rice bowls depend on the Chinese market to eat. If they really fall out with China, their domestic factories will have to close down and workers will lose their jobs. Who is willing to do this kind of loss-making business? Don't look at them shouting fiercely with the United States now. If they really want to go to war, they will keep them one by one and find excuses to slip away.
Looking at Japan and South Korea, there are quite a few US military bases in these two countries, and they look like the "hardcore" of the United States. But the little Jiujiu in their hearts is playing well. Japan's military industry revenue rose by 35% last year, and South Korea's even more impressive increase of 39%. But if they really want to fight with China, do they have enough possessions? These two countries are so close to us that our missiles can reach their doorstep in half an hour. Do they dare to gamble on the safety of the common people? Besides, South Korean cars and Japanese electronic products all rely on our Chinese market for food. It's really embarrassing. The big domestic enterprises have to jump out and oppose it first.
Not to mention those European countries. After the Russia-Ukraine conflict for so long, they have almost run out of artillery shells. Now they are eager to expand and prepare for war. But even by 2027, Germany's largest arms dealer Rheinmetall will only be able to build 1.1 million artillery shells in one year. What is this amount enough for? They can't even supply ammunition for Ukraine now, but can they spare time to help the United States deal with China? To put it bluntly, Europeans are smart. They can follow the United States 'shouts and make some political capital, but there is no way for them to lose their money.
In turn, look at our China side, some say that you can expect only one, I believe, but this "one" is not someone else, it is China itself! The elderly people often say, rely on the mountain, rely on everyone, the key moment must rely on themselves. We can now produce 1.4 trillion kilograms of food a year, energy self-sufficiency rate remains at more than 80%, even if the supply is broken outside, our own dish is also stable.
Someone might say that the U.S. military industry is great, 41 companies account for half of the global arms sales. But let's not forget that the battle is not only the number of weapons, but also who can turn the factory. The U.S. large companies, last year Lockheed Martin sales also dropped 1.6%, Rae God dropped 1.3%, why? because they supply chain is too complex, a circle of complete. We are not the same China, from screw to fighter, the entire industrial chain is in their own hands, to the real war, our factory can produce horse-power, such a thing in the world there are not a few countries.
Think about the resistance to U.S. aggression and aid Korea, when we were so poor and weak, and the United States came with a 16-nation coalition force. Didn't we be afraid? Although the Soviet Union gave some support at that time, it really relied on our own soldiers, our own factories, and our own people to tighten their belts to support the front line. Now our family is much thicker than at that time. High-speed rail can transport troops, 5G can command, and drones can conduct reconnaissance. These are all hard powers we have developed ourselves.
We still have nuclear weapons, the treasure at the bottom of the pressure box. If you don't use this thing, it will be earth-shattering when you use it. With this thing, no one dares to drive us to a dead end. Don't look at those allies of the United States who are really cheering now, they really face the risk of nuclear war, and they can run faster than anyone else.
In the end, there are no forever friends between nations, only eternal interests.The allies of the United States shouted "unity" in their mouths, and in their hearts all played their own calculator.Europe should rely on our markets, Japan and Korea should be afraid of our firepower, they were allied with the United States, but only wanted to make a little bit of the price, really wanted to let them bleed hard, and the door did not.
We are different from China. After all these years of ups and downs, we have long understood a truth: strengthening ourselves is the last word. We 1.40 billion people twisted into a rope, food is enough to eat, energy is enough to burn, factories are strong enough, and weapons are hard enough. No one is afraid of such a country. Those who say we can only count on one, they are right, the most reliable force is the Chinese people themselves who stand up, get rich and become strong!
The United States wants to pull a group of "wine and meat friends" to scare us, which is a wrong calculation. We Chinese have never believed in evil and are not afraid of pressure. If someone really dares to invade the border, our own fists will be hard enough, and our own spine will be straight enough, so we don't need to look at others' faces at all. The most reliable ally in the world is always our own strength and the unity of the people. This is the most solid foundation for our China!
Although the list of U.S. allies is long, when it comes to getting serious, there is a question mark whether these relationships are reliable or not. Fighting is not about shouting slogans. Geographical location, resources, and production capabilities cannot be clear.
Let's start with NATO, which the United States hopes most. They have an Article 5 clause, which says that if one ally is attacked, even if everyone is attacked, it sounds quite scary. But there are many tricks involved here. The terms clearly state that they only protect Europe and North America. According to the rules, they are not obligated to get involved in our affairs in Asia.
Besides, those European countries are now doing business with China, with hundreds of billions of dollars of sales every year, German cars and French cosmetics, and how many rice bowls depend on the Chinese market to eat. If they really fall out with China, their domestic factories will have to close down and workers will lose their jobs. Who is willing to do this kind of loss-making business? Don't look at them shouting fiercely with the United States now. If they really want to go to war, they will keep them one by one and find excuses to slip away.
Looking at Japan and South Korea, there are quite a few US military bases in these two countries, and they look like the "hardcore" of the United States. But the little Jiujiu in their hearts is playing well. Japan's military industry revenue rose by 35% last year, and South Korea's even more impressive increase of 39%. But if they really want to fight with China, do they have enough possessions? These two countries are so close to us that our missiles can reach their doorstep in half an hour. Do they dare to gamble on the safety of the common people? Besides, South Korean cars and Japanese electronic products all rely on our Chinese market for food. It's really embarrassing. The big domestic enterprises have to jump out and oppose it first.
Not to mention those European countries. After the Russia-Ukraine conflict for so long, they have almost run out of artillery shells. Now they are eager to expand and prepare for war. But even by 2027, Germany's largest arms dealer Rheinmetall will only be able to build 1.1 million artillery shells in one year. What is this amount enough for? They can't even supply ammunition for Ukraine now, but can they spare time to help the United States deal with China? To put it bluntly, Europeans are smart. They can follow the United States 'shouts and make some political capital, but there is no way for them to lose their money.
In turn, look at our China side, some say that you can expect only one, I believe, but this "one" is not someone else, it is China itself! The elderly people often say, rely on the mountain, rely on everyone, the key moment must rely on themselves. We can now produce 1.4 trillion kilograms of food a year, energy self-sufficiency rate remains at more than 80%, even if the supply is broken outside, our own dish is also stable.
Someone might say that the U.S. military industry is great, 41 companies account for half of the global arms sales. But let's not forget that the battle is not only the number of weapons, but also who can turn the factory. The U.S. large companies, last year Lockheed Martin sales also dropped 1.6%, Rae God dropped 1.3%, why? because they supply chain is too complex, a circle of complete. We are not the same China, from screw to fighter, the entire industrial chain is in their own hands, to the real war, our factory can produce horse-power, such a thing in the world there are not a few countries.
Think about the resistance to U.S. aggression and aid Korea, when we were so poor and weak, and the United States came with a 16-nation coalition force. Didn't we be afraid? Although the Soviet Union gave some support at that time, it really relied on our own soldiers, our own factories, and our own people to tighten their belts to support the front line. Now our family is much thicker than at that time. High-speed rail can transport troops, 5G can command, and drones can conduct reconnaissance. These are all hard powers we have developed ourselves.
We still have nuclear weapons, the treasure at the bottom of the pressure box. If you don't use this thing, it will be earth-shattering when you use it. With this thing, no one dares to drive us to a dead end. Don't look at those allies of the United States who are really cheering now, they really face the risk of nuclear war, and they can run faster than anyone else.
In the end, there are no forever friends between nations, only eternal interests.The allies of the United States shouted "unity" in their mouths, and in their hearts all played their own calculator.Europe should rely on our markets, Japan and Korea should be afraid of our firepower, they were allied with the United States, but only wanted to make a little bit of the price, really wanted to let them bleed hard, and the door did not.
We are different from China. After all these years of ups and downs, we have long understood a truth: strengthening ourselves is the last word. We 1.40 billion people twisted into a rope, food is enough to eat, energy is enough to burn, factories are strong enough, and weapons are hard enough. No one is afraid of such a country. Those who say we can only count on one, they are right, the most reliable force is the Chinese people themselves who stand up, get rich and become strong!
The United States wants to pull a group of "wine and meat friends" to scare us, which is a wrong calculation. We Chinese have never believed in evil and are not afraid of pressure. If someone really dares to invade the border, our own fists will be hard enough, and our own spine will be straight enough, so we don't need to look at others' faces at all. The most reliable ally in the world is always our own strength and the unity of the people. This is the most solid foundation for our China!