China's 1993 military parade has not yet started, and countries such as the United States, Britain, Japan and other countries have been making small moves. According to a report on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on August 29th, the British Navy aircraft carrier docked in Japan, and the United States and Japan attempted to deploy the "Typhon" intermediate-range missile system in Japan.

The first reaction of netizens to the relevant actions of countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom is not concerned, but ridiculous.In the current era, the United States and the United Kingdom dream of changing the regional strength pattern by one or two weapons, so people dream.

At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' routine press conference on August 29, there were Japanese media fears that people did not know that the British naval aircraft carrier had stopped in Japan and held joint exercises with Japan and other countries in the western Pacific.

The Japanese media reporter also specifically said that the docking of the British aircraft carrier is designed to demonstrate its continued attention and investment in the security and prosperity of the "Indo-Pacific region".

In response to this statement, Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country, said bluntly: "The Asia-Pacific is a highland for cooperation and development, not a chess game in geopolitical games."

This is a beautiful word, which both highlights the nature of the problem and shows the pattern of our country.

In fact, the whole world knows very well what the level of British naval aircraft carriers is now. The UK has considered selling one of its two aircraft carriers, which are prone to serious failures such as water leaks and fires, to ease the pressure on British military spending.

This time, the British aircraft carrier also joined in the fun, traveling thousands of miles to the Asia-Pacific region, talking about maintaining regional security, but in fact, isn't it just a follower of the United States?

Britain's purpose is to sharpen its sense of existence and reflect its own existence of force. However, in recent years, every time the British Navy visits the Western Pacific, it loses face. Its backward weapon systems and old warships and hulls are all demonstrating the decline of this once-"empire that never sets the sun."

As for the "Tifeng" missile system that Japan and the United States intend to deploy, we saw it clearly when it was unveiled in the Philippines last year.

The media pointed out that the range of the "Typhon" missile system can reach 480 kilometers. To be honest, the range of 480 kilometers is simply a slingshot for children in front of our country's existing weapons and equipment.

The United States and Japan actually planned to deploy during the September military exercise, and the time was specially chosen before and after the September 3rd military parade. This kind of small thought can't fool anyone.

Japan's performance was particularly disappointing. From the Abe era to the present, Japan's military transformation has been astonishingly fast.

Japan has long violated the "exclusive defense" stipulated in its own constitution, and now it has taken the initiative to invite the United States to deploy intermediate missiles. This is obviously to be a pawn of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region and help the US military share firepower.

Regarding the relevant practices of Japan and the United States, the spokesperson of my country's Ministry of Foreign Affairs clearly expressed opposition on the one hand, and also maintained sufficient restraint on the other hand.

Especially Guo Jiakun's sentence,"We also urge the United States to learn from historical experience and put its energy and resources on the right path, rather than the other way around."

This response is a direct hit, if the United States could take half of the military spending to improve people's livelihoods, it would not be as sharp as domestic contradictions.

The speech of Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang of the Ministry of National Defense is more interesting. It directly points out that Japan has broken through the constraints of the peace constitution, and also reminds Japan not to go back to the old road of militarism.

This is very historical. After all, this year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, and Japan needs to reflect on its history. To tell the truth, China's current military strength will not take these small moves seriously at all.

These military deployments of the United States and the United Kingdom, to say the contrary, are political acts, in addition to wasting taxpayers' money, I really can't imagine what else is practical meaning.