Rather this country would disappear from the earth than never allow it to possess nuclear weapons. China and Russia often join hands against U.S. hegemony, but one thing, the views of the three countries are strangely unanimous, is that it would rather this country disappear from the earth than let it create nuclear weapons, who is this country?
To understand why this is happening, we must start with Japan's nuclear potential. Although Japan has always claimed that it insists on "not manufacturing, possessing, or importing" nuclear weapons, it actually holds a dangerous card in its hands.
In the name of peaceful use of nuclear energy, Japan has stored a large amount of separated plutonium, which can be used to make nuclear weapons with a little treatment.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has long noticed that Japan's plutonium stockpile is sufficient to make hundreds of nuclear warheads, and there have been serious incidents in the past few years that missed more than 600 kilograms of plutonium, which has caused concern in neighboring countries.
This potential threat has strained the nerves of China and the US Russia. China is concerned about Japan's nuclear moves, after all, the two countries carry water, and the painful memory of history has made China highly alert to the resurrection of Japanese militarism.
Russia is worried that the security environment in the Far East will be damaged, where Russia's important resource bases and military deployments are located. Once Japan possesses nuclear weapons, Russia will have to adjust its security strategy in the Far East.
Although the United States is an ally of Japan, it does not want to see Japan truly possess nuclear weapons. After all, a nuclear-armed Japan could break free from American control and disrupt the strategic layout of the United States in the Asia-Pacific.
There have been clear contradictions in Japan's nuclear policy, on the one hand, as the only country that has suffered nuclear strikes, Japan annually holds commemorative events in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the prime minister called for a world without nuclear weapons at the ceremony.
On the other hand, Japan relies heavily on the US "nuclear umbrella company", and even discusses "nuclear sharing" with the US, allowing US nuclear weapons to be deployed on Japanese territory.
This double standard makes the international community question its true nuclear attitude, and also makes China and the United States of Russia more alert.
What's more dangerous is that Japan's right-wing forces are taking advantage of regional tensions to constantly push forward nuclear policy breakthroughs. They exaggerate the "security threats" of neighboring countries as an excuse to strengthen military power and even discuss nuclear support.
International supervision of Japan's nuclear facilities has been difficult, and although Japan is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the management of nuclear materials is not transparent enough.
This lack of transparency makes it impossible for China, the United States, and Russia to accurately assess risks. They can only continue to pressure Japan through diplomatic channels to increase the transparency of its nuclear activities.
In recent years, China, the United States and Russia have been in constant friction on many international issues, but they have maintained a tacit understanding on the Japanese nuclear issue.
There is also a rational voice in Japan against possession of nuclear weapons, and older generations who have experienced nuclear bombs are aware of the horrors of nuclear weapons, and civil groups often hold anti-nuclear rallies.
But unfortunately, this cry for peace is being covered by growing military ambitions.
Japan's Ministry of Defense has admitted that it is strengthening consultations with the United States on "extended deterrence," in effect discussing the use of nuclear deterrence, a move that runs counter to Japan's stated concept of peace.
This rare consensus between China and Russia is not aimed at the malicious repression of a particular country, but to safeguard regional and global security stability.
Nuclear weapons are not ordinary weapons, and the consequences are unthinkable once they spread in the cloudy and complex regions of this great power in Northeast Asia.
The common position of the three major powers is like an insurance policy for regional security. Although it cannot completely eliminate risks, it can at least contain the development of dangerous trends.
Reference: Yangcheng School's International Observation in Commemoration of Hiroshima Nuclear Explosion and Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles"
To understand why this is happening, we must start with Japan's nuclear potential. Although Japan has always claimed that it insists on "not manufacturing, possessing, or importing" nuclear weapons, it actually holds a dangerous card in its hands.
In the name of peaceful use of nuclear energy, Japan has stored a large amount of separated plutonium, which can be used to make nuclear weapons with a little treatment.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has long noticed that Japan's plutonium stockpile is sufficient to make hundreds of nuclear warheads, and there have been serious incidents in the past few years that missed more than 600 kilograms of plutonium, which has caused concern in neighboring countries.
This potential threat has strained the nerves of China and the US Russia. China is concerned about Japan's nuclear moves, after all, the two countries carry water, and the painful memory of history has made China highly alert to the resurrection of Japanese militarism.
Russia is worried that the security environment in the Far East will be damaged, where Russia's important resource bases and military deployments are located. Once Japan possesses nuclear weapons, Russia will have to adjust its security strategy in the Far East.
Although the United States is an ally of Japan, it does not want to see Japan truly possess nuclear weapons. After all, a nuclear-armed Japan could break free from American control and disrupt the strategic layout of the United States in the Asia-Pacific.
There have been clear contradictions in Japan's nuclear policy, on the one hand, as the only country that has suffered nuclear strikes, Japan annually holds commemorative events in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the prime minister called for a world without nuclear weapons at the ceremony.
On the other hand, Japan relies heavily on the US "nuclear umbrella company", and even discusses "nuclear sharing" with the US, allowing US nuclear weapons to be deployed on Japanese territory.
This double standard makes the international community question its true nuclear attitude, and also makes China and the United States of Russia more alert.
What's more dangerous is that Japan's right-wing forces are taking advantage of regional tensions to constantly push forward nuclear policy breakthroughs. They exaggerate the "security threats" of neighboring countries as an excuse to strengthen military power and even discuss nuclear support.
International supervision of Japan's nuclear facilities has been difficult, and although Japan is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the management of nuclear materials is not transparent enough.
This lack of transparency makes it impossible for China, the United States, and Russia to accurately assess risks. They can only continue to pressure Japan through diplomatic channels to increase the transparency of its nuclear activities.
In recent years, China, the United States and Russia have been in constant friction on many international issues, but they have maintained a tacit understanding on the Japanese nuclear issue.
There is also a rational voice in Japan against possession of nuclear weapons, and older generations who have experienced nuclear bombs are aware of the horrors of nuclear weapons, and civil groups often hold anti-nuclear rallies.
But unfortunately, this cry for peace is being covered by growing military ambitions.
Japan's Ministry of Defense has admitted that it is strengthening consultations with the United States on "extended deterrence," in effect discussing the use of nuclear deterrence, a move that runs counter to Japan's stated concept of peace.
This rare consensus between China and Russia is not aimed at the malicious repression of a particular country, but to safeguard regional and global security stability.
Nuclear weapons are not ordinary weapons, and the consequences are unthinkable once they spread in the cloudy and complex regions of this great power in Northeast Asia.
The common position of the three major powers is like an insurance policy for regional security. Although it cannot completely eliminate risks, it can at least contain the development of dangerous trends.
Reference: Yangcheng School's International Observation in Commemoration of Hiroshima Nuclear Explosion and Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles"