Recently, a commentary edition of the U.S. Wall Street Journal published an article that caused the American academic community to laugh because the author of this article ¨C the U.S. anti-China politician Mike, who was sanctioned by China.Gallagher(Mike Gallagher), actually publicly called on the US government to expel Chinese students from Harvard University back to China.

But his reason is extremely absurd, and even after reading it, it will give people the impression of "IQ flameout"...

Chinese students are an important group to promote cultural exchanges between China and the United States, but they have also become a thorn in the side of some anti-China politicians in the United States.

However, in contrast to the previous demonization of the student group, in the article he wrote to the Wall Street Journal, Garagell also threw a very striking view that he believed that known American universities such as Harvard have become the soil of "left" thought, so would be willing to receive so many foreign students from China, for "America's opponent" to train talents.

In other words, in addition to blackmailing Chinese students, Garagher is also firing fire on the American university¡¯s own ideology.

Mike Gallagher, a US anti-China politician sanctioned by China, issued a document

So far, his article has drawn rebukes from a number of rational scholars in the United States. Among them, Michael D. Swaine, a senior scholar at the Quincy Institute of National Affairs, an American think tank, said in an online post that Gallagher's absurd views stem from an "ideological hysteria."

Steven, a senior scholar at the Quincy National Institute of Affairs, dismissed Garagell.

This "ideological hysteria" is not only Gallagher's narrow and extreme prejudice against China. His bombardment of famous American universities such as Harvard is also closely related to the increasingly extreme and antagonistic political atmosphere in the United States in the past few years.

From the American media¡¯s many public reports of U.S. universities since this year, as well as the disputes on U.S. social media, it is not hard to see that the American universities have long dominated the ideology, a value called ¡°Woke¡± by the U.S. right-wing conservative forces from which Galagher came. These values showed anti-Israeli stance in the Israeli conflict, as well as the respect for identity politics on topics such as racism, hurt the U.S. right-wing conservatives.

The picture shows Gallagher attacking American colleges and universities in the American media that have become "cesspits" of "anti-Semitism".

At the same time, the endless partisanship in recent years between the Republican Party, which uses anti-" awakening culture "to consolidate its base, and the Democratic Party, which uses" awakening culture "to win votes, has further exacerbated this ideological opposition in the United States, leading to more extreme political expressions on both sides. Among them, right-wing conservatives, in order to make their anti-" awakening culture" practices appear more "political correctness" in the United States, tend to associate "awakening culture" with "socialism" and even "communism" at a far-fetched level, and even spread rumors that "awakening culture" is a Chinese infiltration of the United States - even if people in Europe and the United States who study left-wing thought say that "awakening culture" is neither socialism nor communism. Some people argue that "awakening culture" is essentially a distorted product of Western capitalism.

In short, Garagher is now hysterically speaking in the Wall Street Journal about the ideological fanaticism of Chinese students and Harvard University, and is also a continuation of the extreme opposition of U.S. right-wing conservatives to the "Awakening Culture".But in the eyes of those rational American scholars, clear American netizens, and a large number of foreign netizens, what they see is only a political "clown", in an increasingly paranoid political atmosphere, an obsessive proverb.

Gao Lei